1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Arsenal v Tottenham Cross Board Match Thread

Discussion in 'Tottenham Hotspur' started by SpursDisciple, Feb 24, 2012.

  1. theHotHead

    theHotHead New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    3,155
    Likes Received:
    9
    PNP - I don't know what footage you have seen to be so adamant that Gibbs caught Bale, but I haven't seen any video that shows any contact whatsoever <ok>

    Any contact there may have been therefore should NOT have resulted on Bale falling over in a heap like he did !
     
    #421
  2. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,185
    Likes Received:
    55,668
    There's no such thing as the last man rule, but he clearly was the last man.
    There was nobody behind him.

    He didn't commit a foul though, so it's rather academic.
     
    #422
  3. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    123,407
    Likes Received:
    71,650
  4. theHotHead

    theHotHead New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    3,155
    Likes Received:
    9
    Its not called the last man rule but it is preventing a goal scoring opportunity and because the keeper was not the last man, i.e. Gibbs was next to Bale, a goal scoring opportunity was not prevented.
     
    #424
  5. PowerSpurs

    PowerSpurs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,058
    Likes Received:
    5,649
    TV resolution is not good enough to show that there wasn't contact. It is sometimes good enough to prove that there was. On this occasion its is not fully conclusive but Bale's feet get tangled at exactly the instant that Gibbs' foot passes him. That seems clear evidence of contact rather than cheating to me. He didn't 'hang out a leg' he was running normally. I've seen Bale dive twice and I'm ashamed he did it, but he shouldn't be wrongly accused.
     
    #425
  6. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,185
    Likes Received:
    55,668
    Looks like a picture taken of one of your stands for a normal game actually, Piskie.
     
    #426

  7. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    123,407
    Likes Received:
    71,650
    Just to put you in the picture (literally and metaphorically) it was the away section after Walcott banged in the 5th <ok>
     
    #427
  8. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,185
    Likes Received:
    55,668
    I'm sorry, but that's clearly a misinterpretation of the rule.
    If you reverse the situation, so that the last defender makes the foul with only the keeper between the attacker and the goal, then it's inarguably a red card.
    Having only an outfield player to beat, rather than a goalkeeper, actually makes it more of a clear goalscoring opportunity.

    I don't think that it was one though, because Bale took the ball well wide of the goal with his final touch.
    If he'd still had it under control, then it would've seen a dismissal, in my opinion.
     
    #428
  9. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    123,407
    Likes Received:
    71,650
    This is a picture of our stands <ok>

    emirates.jpg
     
    #429
  10. PowerSpurs

    PowerSpurs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,058
    Likes Received:
    5,649
    But it was Gibbs who did the foul not the keeper! It was only 'not a goalscoring opportunity' if the goalie was sure to save it. Since everyone agrees that he didn't touch the ball at all the ref might easily have red carded Gibbs. I suspect the reason he didn't was because he didn't know who committed the foul. Many refs would have shown a red card and the discussion on here would be very different. As I said I think the ref got it right because it was a foul and there was not a certainty that Bale would have got a shooting chance. On such little things the whole match can be decided.
     
    #430
  11. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,185
    Likes Received:
    55,668
    Given that your fans have a tendency to walk out after about 10 minutes if you're not winning, you're really not making a point.
    There's also nothing to back up your claim, unlike your mass exodus at WHL when you were 4-0 down a few years ago.
     
    #431
  12. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,185
    Likes Received:
    55,668
    A NLD isn't a normal game.
    Your own AGM revealed that your ground is 15% empty for most games, didn't it?
     
    #432
  13. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    123,407
    Likes Received:
    71,650
    <laugh>

    Are you trying to claim that the picture is not of the away section? Where around 80% of your fans have turned their backs on your team.

    Do you mean in the same way that we cleared your ground after we won there 1-4 a couple of years later?
     
    #433
  14. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    Oh God, Piskie's one of those annoying fans that spends the whole game taking photos <doh>

    Beating Tottenham seems to have gotten a little too much for him, it's a good job it won't be happening too often in the future. Have a cup of cocoa and a lie down, Pisk.
     
    #434
  15. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,185
    Likes Received:
    55,668
    No, I'm claiming that you've not proven the time of the picture.

    You 'cleared our ground' after going 4-1 up in extra-time against our reserves.
    We cleared your end after an hour.
     
    #435
  16. NSIS

    NSIS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    36,067
    Likes Received:
    14,555
    Of course he probably went down more easily than he would have done on another part of the pitch. So would 99% of players - including yours'! I really can't see what this ridiculous little squabble is about. Maybe there was some contact, maybe there wasn't. As I said earlier, there have been many, many, far more Dubious decisions that one given.
     
    #436
  17. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    123,407
    Likes Received:
    71,650
    Just taking an opportune moment to capture your exodus and humiliation <whistle>

    The record speaks for itself - Arsenal are the dominant force in North London <ok>
     
    #437
  18. PINKIE

    PINKIE Wurzel Gummidge

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    123,407
    Likes Received:
    71,650
    You're probably best sticking with it being after Walcott banged in the 5th mate. Any earlier and it would have been even more shameful for your lot to have walked out.
     
    #438
  19. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,185
    Likes Received:
    55,668
    The league table begs to differ.

    I'm sure that all of the Spurs fans on here are taking note of your good graces following this game for further reference though, Piskie. <ok>
     
    #439
  20. NSIS

    NSIS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    36,067
    Likes Received:
    14,555
    Let him have his little deluded gloat, PNP. As I say, he's not kidding anyone but himself. One day he might be able to see the world as it is, instead of through his red tinted specs <laugh>
     
    #440

Share This Page