I know you obviously don't like Man United and Liverpool as you support Chelsea skinman but calling Scholes " a fat scummy **** " and Gerrard a " thief " is a bit deep aint it just because they play for rival teams?
Sorry mate didn't realise you was a Fulham fan, your signature thing says " PRIDE OF WEST LONDON " so assumed you was a Chelsea fan as they've been the best team in West London for a while.
Anyone who thinks that Gerrard or Lampard are better than Scholes clearly knows nothing about football.
I think Gerrard, as he has basically had to carry a whole team for the last 10 years, even gaining Euro glory under Rafa!! Lampard was good for about 4 or 5 seasons, but for the last few seasons hes not the player he was. Rest of the team carry him along. Scholes.... always the grafter, good vision, but has never had to be the driving force for every game. Had such quality around him, makes life easier for him.
Scholes is dirty, and would've been sent of 3 times more if he'd played for any other team, Gerrard is selfish and generally only plays for himself, so I'm giving it to Lampard.
I go along with that, we wouldn't want to be seen discriminating against people just because they are fat
The reality is, they've all been excellent and would have graced virtually any side ever built, if Scholes could tackle at all, he'd probably be regarded as the best CM England has ever produced, as he was utterly **** at tackling though, he's probably at a similar level to the other two talent wise, yet with his consistency over such a long period, I'd just about give him the nod over the others.