1, Same for both sides and we werent playing stoke or wimbledon. Then played all the football. Maybe on a decent pitch it would of been 7-0 2, WOuldnt of mattered 3, ibra was 4, .... 5, he rugby tackled him
You shouldnt fall for the media hype. Yes he is better than walcott but he isnt that good. Maybe he will grow.
More bad news, koscielny will miss the Mackems on saturday, it's a knee problem. Might be quite serious. Looks like we're stuck with Djourou.
With Oxo, I think we could have got a result like 4-2, which would still have been bad but better than before. We really, really lacked creativity in the first half.
It was a close decision - you aren't going to get them all called, whether he was on or off. Fact is, when you play against other big clubs, sometimes it is their turn. You just don't win them all.
Think what your saying for a minute. Your saying that 1 player would of made 2 goals difference vs AC Milan. If that is the case then Oxo is easily the greatest player of all time. He is just a kid. Yes he has talent and I believe he should of started. He could be a top player. But the hype is suggesting he is some sort of god. Its cos he is young and he is english. The media already building him up. No point falling for it. He is good but he isnt anywhere close to world class yet. And yet you think he would make 2 goals difference vs one of the best teams in the world
Can't believe people saying it was'nt a Penalty,. He was tripped and had a hand round his throat,your player did'nt protest,even in rugby that would have been foul play
