Tainted Titles Mk II

Following on from the taigs claims that titles Rangers have won while in debt should be taken off them, does the same apply to the occupiers of the Tattie Dome?

At the moment Celtic are in debt to the tune of £2m, with the figure being reduced from £9m. Does this mean that any title won by Celtic while in debt (using someone elses money to buy the success) should be removed from them?

It's pretty clear that any trophy won this year should also be regarded as 'tainted'.

 

That is piss poor.

 

ST said "While under investigation from HMRC".....just ignore that fact though and change it to "while in debt"

Cheating Hun ****s.

 

Where am I wrong? <taintedtitle> <winnersbydefault>

 

Shut it ya twats. Debt is debt.

 

man utd are in debt. only a billion though

 

See Venom's answer.

Winners by default? Winners because we're not tax-dodging cheats

 

Someone else has paid for Celtics success, however limited it has been.

 

please log in to view this image

 

please log in to view this image

 

Yes you're right ML

Craig Whyte should write to the SFA

Would he like to borrow a pen?

 

FFS this is total desperation from the Berz.

 

Your phone needs charged, ST.

 

That photo was taken last night at Heathrow as Whyte fled. I think it was actually taken by a hun.

 

He bumped Daniel Cousins

 

Debt is fine - if you can afford to pay it back

 

Surely Rangers can't run out with five stars on their jersey on Saturday that would be taking the p&ss,

 

Sky this morning on their ticker, broke Rangers year for year down ,what they won , who they bought and what tax money they cheated and there is Huns on here wanting to gloat about tainted titles

 

Simply The Best

 

A message for Rangers:

[video=youtube;NRVaLs4cBlg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRVaLs4cBlg&feature=youtu.be[/video]