Hi Moses Venom here. Question 1: Fancy a bum? Question 2: If yes to "Question 1" then where and when? Queation 3: Isis is a palindrome?
I was on the original 606 boards way back Dev. I gave up when they changed them about the mid 2000's couldn't be arsed with the new format. Carried on reading the stuff, but thought after all the stuff going down just now I should kind of show solidarity. Now I'm Moses. I'll issue the commandments later.
Hello Venom, Thanks for your kind enquiries. 1: I did kind of think Margot Kidder was kind of cute when she went all homeless back in the day. When she lost her front teeth I stopped being attracted to her so probably it's the negative. I don't fancy her any more though. 2: See 1 good luck on your hobo hunt all the same. 3: Strictly speaking palindromes are the same word backwards. Here's a really freaky one for you. S A T O R A R E P O T E N E T O P E R A R O T A S
BTW for all the slurs against the Catholic Church what I will say is that many large organisations with access to young people will attract *****s. The Scouts? Youth football? Anyway when I visited Auschwitz not too long ago we were told the remarkable and sad story of a Roman Catholic Priest. Father Maximillian Kolbe. http://www.fatherkolbe.com/ Read it and tell me what you think.
Yes Tom you're right he does seem like a remarkable man. The problem with a lot of Old firm fans is they try and use faith to their own purposes. I can't really abide either version of supposed Christianity in this country, but that's just my personal opinion. If Jesus was kicking about today he would sort out both the catholics and protestants like he did the moneylenders in the temple. I wonder what he'd say about ticketus though I would doubt a bare minimum of supporters who bleat on about all the catholic protestant **** even go to church in the first place. Imagine no religion like the real Lennon said. For me religion and politics have nothing to do with football. Both sides are guilty of that despite the mock indignation and point scoring that occur whenever either topic is raised. The unhealthy obsession with *****philes seems to have permeated society today. When I was growing up there seemed to be an analgous obsession with gays. Homosexuality was the vehicle for derogatory remarks, "your a ****", "he's a ****" and so forth. Strangely enough today's youth very rarely give each other homophobic abuse and rightly so. The ***** has replaced the **** as the commonplace term of abuse amongst the young. Where do go from here? Will *****philes demand rights and in twenty years time we will see paodo pride marches? Off course not nor I am in any way inferring a connection between homosexuality and child molesters. It's just that both terms were seen as taboos in the context of the times the disparate generations that use the terms for abusive purposes inhabit. I mean Family guy even has that character Herbert. I mean could you imagine watching Scooby Doo in the 70's and they had some paodo guy that travelled about in the mystery machine. Sure folk shouldn't be using terms like paodos to give abuse on internet forums, but it's the bravery of being out of range isn't it? When the stuff that has happened to Rangers happens rightly or wrongly and folk post hundreds of provocative articles how do you think the lowest common denominator is going to respond? It's point scoring and folk don't realise how serious it actually is. Just like all the vapid comments about how woman will be beaten up by the supporters of the losing team of an old firm derby. This post has now become as tedious as everything I have just ranted on about. I'm away to the game now for my restricted ticket view. Come on the bears
