Absolutely they are,all of them!! Have not bought one for years and years and years. National Boycott anyone???????
This is all a bit embaressing...the papers and mass media have treated many people badly from innocent people locked up for crimes they didn't commit to making lies up about groups like the miners and Liverpool dock strikers. They commit libel against those who are too poor to sue and bully those to weak to fight back. And you propose a boycott cos they report on suarez refusing to shake hands... If this is such a bad thing to have done why did LFC and suarez apologise. Suarez broke a deal ... In effect he lied... Surely that us was has caused.LFC problems today.
That yidlump Samuel (hasn't he got enough to worry about with his wedding to Heather from Eastenders?)wants Suarez charged with direspute or handshakes to be banned - fair enough. Is the Mail going to call for bans for QPR, Wayne Bridge and Rio X to be similarily charged for refusals and/or threats to not shake hands?
If this is such a bad thing to have done why did LFC and suarez apologise. Fooking hell - it's circular logic time again! "Liverpool mustn't appeal against the FA as it would undermine the fight against racism" - "Liverpool must have accepted the FA's verdict as they didn't appeal against their decision"... Let's see the fookers who called for Suarez and liverpool to apologise now turn it around as a reason to ask for Suarez and Kenny to be shot at dawn for not licking the crusty bits off taggart's ringpiece as quickly as they wanted.
Well if you can find a striking dockers forum or the arthur scargill website you will probably find people there stating that the majority of journalists are complete twats that will print whatever ****e it takes to increase sales. However, you might not of noticed but this is an LFC forum, so no suprise when our take on the media is centered around the reporting of all things LFC. You big dope!
I'm not calling for a boycott purely based on the Suarez case. With a few honourable exceptions (individual journalists ) the british media are appalling.This does not only apply to sports journalism but also in a broader context,some of which you rightly point out. As you will know, the 'Sun' has been subject to boycott on merseyside for over 20 years with a great degree of success (i.e. profits well down ) So,i'm suggesting a boycott on a wider scale to hit them where it hurts.
Piers Morgan(ex-editor and the twat who admitted listening to hacked voicemails and would not reveal the culprit responsible for hacking private messages)had the bare faced cheek to slag LFC off over the Suarez saga on Twitter.
Agreed. Join DateJan 2011LocationPage MossPosts4,660Points10,920Level45 [h=2] please log in to view this image [/h] please log in to view this image Originally Posted by Rickie Lamberts Golden Boot please log in to view this image Then I've been on twitter and Piers Morgan was also saying it was wrong Piers Morgan who openly admitted he listened to hacked voicemails while he was a Fleet Street hack.
why not call the media's bluff? Go to their website and see if they post your comment which includes the word 'black' or 'your sisters ****'? And not 606 provides the answer. btw - 'your sisters ****' does not equate with '**** you' or '**** me' - if you have a problem with me what's my sister got to do with it?
I assume that you're talking about shagging grannies, because I thought running up to a TV camera and yelling "**** You" while on the field of play was 'during a game' for which he was banned for two matches. Do correct me? As for being the arbiter of morality, to which the FA aspires, then all the other bad behaviour which football players commit off the field does reflect onto the game in general, as many of the 'endorsements' are as a direct result of their 'on-field profiles', which they jealously guard using Messers Sue, Grabbit and Runne... Strangely, the FA has no view on this reflection of their prize assets (perhaps because the revelation of their prize possessions as hedonistic, sex-crazed, misanthropic yobs who care little for the society that produced them isn't a picture that the FA cares to reveal, despite knowing about it - educating young players isn't something they seem to give a **** about...) as vermin off the pitch...
You have been mugged by the " M. U. F.A. MEDIA MACHINE" try and accept it and move on, you cannot win against these C**ts. The MACHINE will probably ease off on you now and concentrate fully on how to stop City winning the league, keep your eyes open to witness the strange events that will undoubtably take place between now and season end!
I am also looking forward to seeing how old red nose goes about his business to try and de-rail City, the games will be starting very soon that's for sure.
He's currently in a meeting with the Worlds Media and the F.A. discussing this very topic, whilst all patting themselves on the back for the success of the "Lets F**k Liverpool Project" along with honouring Evra for his undercover work.
I overlooked that. Mainly because Rooney was found guilty and publicly apologised very quickly after the event took place. Man United did not once condone his actions
