Possum I can't BELIEVE the police haven't convicted you for all your crimes yet. Drug dealing, beastiality, international espionage and genocide. You're a fraud. Admittedly I don't have proof of this, but in the dream world you seem to reside in, being unable to prove wrongdoing doesn't matter. Let me cite an example, I catch **** in every job I go to because people assume that I am a child abuser. My crime is being a man working in primary school. I am treated differently by parents who don't expect a man to be doing the job, and on a few occasions parents have asked that their child be removed from my class, because they aren't comfortable with a man taking the class. They have no proof or anything at all to indicate wrongdoing but they make an assumption, a judgement all their own based on their perceptions and newspaper reports. People who do the guilty until proven innocent thing, are morons. Sorry, but your actions and behaviour are, in fact, moronic. Along with all the others who presume people to be guilty before the completion of a trial, or before strong evidence is presented.
Innocent untill proven guilty, that applies to people I dislike aswell such as JT. The day when that ends will be a sad day for freedom, I dont seriously believe the jury would be influenced just by a footie manager.
Fair play to you, its criminal the lack of good male primary school teachers. A whole generation of kids will grow up without a good male influence just because of a ridicolous stereotype which in the vast majority holds no truth whatsoever.
Not quite. Try "he is associated with p*rtsmouth, so he must be a criminal." See, that works, doesn't it?
It is better that ten guilty men go free than an innocent man is convicted. You have to prove guilt in this country, which is much better than in some countries where it seems you can be convicted on the flimsiest of evidence.
I am not sure it's better that way fran but yes it is important that people are not convicted because there is not enough concrete proof evidence and of course some criminals will go free because of it and again in my opinion HR is one of them. In fact I would say fatandfunky is HR. Also ken how do you know all my weekend activities ?
Also, I love how Peter 'telling' Storrie has escaped unscathed.....again. Maybe, considering all he really did was irreparably damage Pompey, they saw it as just a small infringement. Theres still only one peter storrie.
Having an opinion is fine, having a baseless one isn't. Try to explain to us what you are basing your opinion from, and why you think your opinion based on the facts you're using holds stronger ground than the decisions of the courts?
Damn that "lack of proof" defense. Gone are the good old days when you could wildly accuse random strangers of raping you, and the court would sentence them guilty based on your word. Why is it that those pompous, arrogant arseholes at the Southwark Crown Court today feel like they need evidence of tax evasion in order to find someone guilty of tax evasion? It's political correctness gone mad!
Oh come now, I carry no grudge against 'Arry, got over that along time ago, but you surely are blinded by the light if you see no incriminating acts during the case. Fair play, he got off, hopefully he'll get the England job because as a man manager, he is what we need with our currant rabble. But if you think he is cleaner than clean....your mistaken.
Not to mention those twelve individuals, selected at random from the electoral roll who, when presented with all of the evidence decided within hours and unanimously that neither defendant was guilty of either charge.
I totally agree with you, but I don't want him to be the England manager as I have a soft spot for Spurs.
No, I don't see any incriminating acts. I think we're talking about a man who is incapable of handling his own financial affairs, but who would not intentionally break the law. All he did wrong was lie to a News of the World journalist, and who can blame him for that? They're scum.
There was no clear proof that it was anything over than an oversight and the small scale of it precluded it being part of a massive fraud...no fan of Harry's but I wouldn't have found them guilty and believe me I'm a person who is usually biased towards the law.
Why did he lie, to get off the phone, well I suggest hanging up next time, then he won't make himself look like such a buffoon(can you see why people are suspicious, off shore accounts, lies, more damn lies). But I must say, after your very poor comparison to a women who accuses a man of rape, I shall have to leave this thread alone because it has become a bit ridiculous.
I never said anything about a woman accusing a man of rape. You're reading into things that aren't there mate. And don't try and lessen my argument by accusing me of such immaturity. That's incredibly petty.
