We should have had a blatant penalty in the first half for a foul and another right at the end for a handball. Still, that won't stop the ABU's claiming Webb is on our payroll
nah, it was a good game to watch, Webb made the second half interesting but 3 0 would have flattered chelsea
Shoulda, coulda, woulda. The Cahill one looked pretty blatant, but then the second one we got was pretty soft. And at the end of the day we should be good enough to win without the ref - if we'd sorted our defending out and been more clinical in the first half we'd have been the ones 3-0 up.
If you look at the stats was 50 50 all the way. Possession, shots etc.....Draw was a fair result for a very entertaining game
I have recently discovered this is a good place to come, before realising that it was all because you weren't around..now it is **** again.
You do realise for a penalty to be given it has to be inside the box? Don't you? Webb was decent, made a few mistakes but wasn't as bad as some are making out. Players make it difficult for refs, Pulis was spot on yesterday IMO
Webb gave us two penalties out of four possibles, apart from that he could quite easily have sent two Chelski players off and I thought he gave them every 50/50 decision. We were in control of the game all afternoon and but for two lucky deflected own goals should have won easily. Chelski are a spent force and they need "The special one " back if they are going to challenge for trophies next year !!!!
Gentlemen Stick with the facts. We were 3-0 down. Simply not good enough. Kudos to the boys for bringing it back to 3-3. HOWEVER ... we shouldn't be 3-0 down against an average Chelsea side!!! We can bitch and moan all we like about referees and fans booing players but - 3-0 down is just not good enough. We are great going forward, but defensively we are a SHAMBLES.
