Can see Harry missing his flight on Monday.

In that case everything's Rosie.

 

I wouldn't ask if it did exist because I'd have seen it.

So far you can't substantiate anything you've said in this thread so it's really a wonder that I'm still replying to you.

Tell you what, if 'Arry's not at Anfield on Monday at 8pm I'll put this quote in my sig and a picture any Liverpool player you choose in my avatar for the rest of the season but if you're wrong you have to have the below picture of Evra as your avatar for a week. Agreed?

please log in to view this image

 

I would'nt have that toerag as my avatar ever mate.

Im basing my opinion on 'Arry's testimony(and the fact he admitted hes a liar)and i know that if i was in his spot and possibly looking at porridge for a few months my family would come first.

Are you basing yours purely on being a Spurs supporter?

 

Nope, his opinion is based purely on ignorance.

 

Surely he'll want to spend his last few hours of freedom with the dog?
Or will she get banged up with him?

 

Poor old Rosie is dead saint.

But never fear 'Arry is the sole heir to her estate in Monaco.

 

You can tell I keep up with stuff can't you? Was it a hit?

 

Admitting you lie is the most honest thing anyone can do.

I'm basing my opinion on the fact that he will be there on Monday because it's his, job, he won't be in jail and he has plenty of time to get to Anfield after court finishes.

 

what a load of sanctimonious bollox, everybody lies and everybody knows it.

 

Admitting your dishonest in court to a jury is'nt very smart mate.

You would put a football match before family even though you might be in jail the following day,but maybe 'Arry wont.

Fair play with your dogged​ support of your club but ffs Yid hes fair game and we're gonna rip him no matter what.'

 

Tbh, no offence to Spurs, but we've had so much ****e thrown at us the last few months it's a relief to have someone else to have a go at.

 

What if he was lying and he doesnt really lie....that would be confusing. I dont know much about the case, but would feel bad for Spurs (momentairily) if their season took a massive U-turn if he was sent down.

 

look guys i don't see this being custodial so while thats the wind up hook.... thats irrelevant to use vid's word.

the relevant part is redkanpp will never be a director of a company again, will get taxes, fines and interest to pay and most likely will be blackened for life.

After all his evidence was SO inconsistent. on the one hand running about asking about a slice of the pie then he's so ungreedy he never knew he had a bonus coming? please.

On the bright side for spurs if they don't mind they can have him for the next 5 years cos england can never touch him now.... unfortunatley that means more nelsons and saha and less bale and modric.... he'll wheel and deal you down the table... great side no, great to watch too but he's buying is driven by bungs not the best for spurs. parker, freidal, walker = good. peinaar, saha, nelson etc very bad. If he gets 120mil to spend what you you honeslty think he'll do?

 

how fuking boring,monotonous bolox based on what you want to happen...yet you cant accept that Suarez was tried and proven guilty of being a racist

 

moron.... I never mentioned suarez once at all..

I've hooked a nice little fishie here no doubt about it.

keep the insults coming there Donna... i hope you enjoy seeing saha play

 

He said he was not a liar because he took oath on the bible.The last time he went to the Church was when there was a funeral.
He should stop kidding us.

 

yid has to defend his man but i think a better line would be to admit harry really really should have settled this out of court. the fact he's stubbornly gone this far means he's got to accept the outcome now. I'd say it'll be a big cheque to the tax man and the embaressment with that.. there'll be no jail, thats just not happening.

Spurs can keep their man cos england are going to be in full high moral gorund mode in the next 6 months, terry situation has seen to that.

 

There's really no problem here I haven't once said he's innocent, I don't know if he is and I don't know if there's enough evidence to prove his guilt either as I'm not a lawyer. I certainly hope he's innocent but even if he is found guilty my understanding is that he's very unlikely to get a custodial sentence. My point in this thread, however, is that the timeframe of the trial means that there's no way he'll be going to jail on Tuesday.

 

He said he would not lie whilst under oath. He said he didn't lie to the police. He might aswell have told the reporter that he won an Oscar in 1974 for best supporting actress for all it matters.