Just a bit of fun Tash, lighten up. Anyway, this thread needs some more nostalgia: please log in to view this image
No, they were being sarcastic... there's no such thing as a 60.4 stat rating or whatever they put, they're just taking the piss out of how specific I am with player stats.
To be fair how much difference does it honestly make to a player's performance in game if they're 78 sprint speed rather than 79?
I am specific with stats... but not to the extent where I would disagree with some over 1 stat point above or below mine.... You've taken the word "specific" and replaced the meaning with "obsessive".
Agree with Colo and Saylor but Willo should be way slower in my opinion. He is our slowest player by a distance and I would be having him closer to 40-50 rather than 60.
I'm not wound up, and I thought you all learned a lesson by not judging someone over text on your screen? You all pictured me as a skinny, spotty little ****, but you all got a bit of a shock. And I know some of you reckon I'm an angry person, with emotional problems, but I'm sure the people on here who have met me, will tell you otherwise. I'm not at all an angry person or easy to wind up or upset.
I can see where you are coming from, but I don't just pick these stats out of thin air, I see how they effect the game and how the stats will effect the player. With my current pace ratings for him, he looks about as fast as he is in real life. 40-50 is seriously snail pace on his game. You should try it for yourself. Go to Willo and make him a 50 for sprint speed. You'll see what I'm talking about.
Will just to let you know, the response was not out of anger and I'm not smashing my head on the keyboard as I type in rage. There's no body language to read over a forum, and I like to think rationally, and don't like to assume people are trying to wum, so I just respond how I would normally, and If you weren't being serious then w/e, at least I got my opinion out on the subject for people to see.
