You haven't explained it at all. You've made up some utter gibberish, which isn't supported in any way by the clip. You've admitted that yourself. He's asked a straight question, after attempting to dodge it for ages and he answers it directly. In order to prove that he's committed a crime, you'd need a lot more than this. It's so vague that it's useless. Leaving aside the result that Lukaszkiewicz gave, I'll just leave you one little link to read: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...raves-World-War-Two-death-camp-Treblinka.html Scans with ground penetrating radar done by a qualified archaeologist on the site recently. Oops! Yes. It's irrelevant until he provides the data and that data now appears to be utterly inaccurate.
What? And I did spend time with my kids. We went to a soft-play area so the kids were on the slides, trampolines etc. Hence I could post the odd single sentence comment on here. I just didn't have the time to be arguing 10 points at a time with you. Glad you've calmed down a bit anyway
His data isnt as inaccurate as you believe it to be, In fact the students data doesnt stand up to scrutiny and asks more questions than it answers you accept the sayings of the student in the link you posted. She has not submitted her report either. It is eagerly awaited Did you know that there is a substantial amount (over $250k I believe) being offered to prove that treblinka happened? There was a reward for similar for a differnt area and a person proved it and the courts made those offering pay, thatwas substantially less
If you don't lose your calm, you do an excellent impression of someone who has Fan. And I come back because it pleases me to do so.
You've made up some totally unconvincing bullshit, when it's clear as day that he's asked a question and he answers it. It's utterly unequivocal and there's no crossed wires. Admitting to committing a crime is quite general, unless you admit to a specific crime. Who has he encouraged to commit which acts? It's unknown, so he can't be charged. The fact that he addresses his covenant of security with the UK makes it so blatant that even you are struggling to deny it. He could be caught on film shooting someone and you still wouldn't admit it, though. Utterly dishonest. That doesn't seem to tally with the information that I've seen. She appears to be a forensic archaeologist who's worked with the police on murder cases. http://www.ideaslab.bham.ac.uk/Talent bank page/index.htm Not quite a neo-Nazi air-traffic controller, I'll admit! His data doesn't exist. As you've claimed that the data from the British archaeologist hasn't been published, how can it fail to hold up to scrutiny? The supposed reward is actually $1,000 for each mass grave containing at least 19 bodies and you have to prove that there were at least 870,000 buried there, in total. It's more neo-Nazi crap, frankly. Very similar to the creationists that offer outlandish sums of money for proof of evolution, before inserting lots of impossible to meet criteria in the small print. It sounds good, but it's actually bullshit.
When i was gone there were loads of Ciaran Paddy IRA threads and Fan was parked on here 24\7 .... I think i scared TFWNN off since returning.....yay
I think that my proof that his mate's a terrorist and that he's been linking to articles published by a member of the NF and an American white separatist may have put him off his stride! With the way that he compartmentalises his thinking, you wouldn't have thought that it would bother him. After all, he's an anti-Western, anti-capitalist religious fanatic that supports Man Utd.
Join the club, i got banned for pointing out to him that there are plenty of Muslim arse bandits.......
His 'proof' for debunking climate change comes from right-wing websites run by rich American businessmen and his anti-war posts from a couple of months back were copied and pasted verbatim from an anti-war website full of unfounded allegations. I don't really care if he believes climate change is a myth or that he's anti-war (as am I) but he seems to spend his time trawling obscure and conspiracy driven websites and trying to pass off the mad ramblings as evidence. He basically looks for answers that fits his mindset and is so stubborn and closed-minded that he is unable to see any other viewpoint. Nearly all his posts are nothing but conjecture.
That's despite his obvious anti-Semitism. He's say that it's anti-Zionism, though. It's those ****ing Jews just trying to make him look bad.
One of the sites that he linked to in the past took it's holocaust denial straight from Stormfront, SET! Not sure that he'd go along with their White Pride, World Wide motto.
