Wrong more like 25k, you make it sound like we weren't successful pre Revie, we competed for the English title with John Charles who was sold to Juve for a world record fee. So you can't say we only became popular in Leeds under Revie.
Ino, most make pathetic excuses for glory supporting. "I support Man U because my cat once drove through manchester so i'm not a glory supporter"
It wasn't a good decision to throw him on. Even with ten men city aren't the opposition to introduce a 37 year old who hasn't played for 7 months
Why, for not giving us a stonewall penalty in the second half? Or have your selective memory goggles refused to acknowledge that one?
Dont think so. With Fletch and Cleverly out we needed somebody and Fergie has been speaking about poor value in January. If we dont sign in the summer i will agree with you.
The red card changes the game, Man U would have been hanging on to the 1-0 scoreline with 10 men, not playing in City's half.
Please can we kill this now tired thread? Man U are so broke they had to get Scholes out of retirement. The day will come when they can't pay their loan interest and then we can start a Scum baiting thread again.
Problem is, by the time that day comes Ken Bates will have sold your stadium to property developers and all your players' organs on the black market. So there won't be a Leeds around the take the piss any more