Transfer Bollocks, Sorry, Rumours

A 2 team league , when one team plays to different rules

 

Are you implying that for the 3 years we won the league we knew all along about the tax case? i think not.

 

Aye, but my dad can drink more than all your dads!

FFS when the school's back? Some weans have hacked ST's Trev's and MD accounts. Harry is the grown up

 

Who mentioned the tax case?

 

What are you chatting about then?

The lloyds debt was the main crutch of rangers, if you are talking about other debts then i think you're being a bit daft really because most clubs have some level of debt.

Would love to continue this but got to go out.

 

Trevor Santos, sometimes it can be quite difficult to win a two team league, just ask the Ranger's managers from 2005/2008 when WGS walked away with year after year.
We know Rangers have redoubled their efforts, that of their friendly clubs, the referees and assistants and the disciplinary officers of the SPL cumulating last season in disgrace. Rangers players red-carded and manhandling the referee. Clubs resting key players against Rangers to have them fit and ready for Celtic. Motherwell and the Killies lying down to Rangers, all to make sure old Walt could leave happy.
It is indeed hard to win a two team league as you say, Motherwell have proved again this year that their aim is to have Rangers on top. Only in Scotland would you have a two team league, in other leagues all teams try to get results all the time but not in what you call a two team league.

 

tinfoil hat

 

super, not sure about that. What about Spain? Surely that's even more of a two-team league than the SPL? In fact it makes the SPL look super competitive.

 

When we were winning the league under o'neill /strachan the majority of the time the league was wrapped up before the split , we didn't have to have Rangers playing all their game first to gain an advantage , and their toughest away fixture after the split disappearing like it did Tynecastle 2010 , Tannadice 2011 Hearts /dundee utd both finished third the season before but Rangers only had to travel to the hardest away game on paper once. It could only happen in one country when the winner get 15 million , who was running our game at the time Gordon Rangers for me Smith and George punch the air for a rangers goal against Celtic Peat!!!

 

Anyone else think we need to sign another goalkeeper as cover and competition?

 

Big Cervi's back, so naw.

 

True Blue, why the hell do you continue to reply to my posts with rubbish.
I have told you before to keep your rubbish about my posts to yourself.

For your information most of us know that most leagues are a two horse race, the difference in Scotland is the handicap system ensures that the blue team
has a fair better chance of winning. In Spain they don't involve a handicap system and although there may only be two teams likely to win, the winner does not get official help.
Take your true blue and go and leave me and my posts alone.

 

super, are you referring to the split or referee/establishment bias? Hand on heart do you really believe referees are biased? I don't.
I think FIFA / the bookies would be pretty quick to pick up on anything dodgy. It also does referees a disservice to suggest they are bias. That is the refereeing cardinal sin. I think many may be not very good but I honestly don't think they are biased. It's a very depressing state of affairs of they are, what then is the point?

 

True f..ing Blue. How the hell would you know, your only information received is via Sky, and as you have no experience of attending games you listen to the opinions and agree with whatever idiot is wearing your favourite colour of blue.

It's a very depressing state of affairs of they are, what then is the point?
I don't know what your point would be or is?
I know according to most football men in power in your country think FIFA is corrupt, so we can hardly expect Fifa to study corruption in wee Scotland next door to the almighty England. The bookies are more than happy with a bit of corruption, as long as they are aware of it and can wager it into their odds.
maybe the bookies worry without the referee bias Scottish Football would be too predictable and hence their takings and profit would drop.

 

Are we all agreed super hooper is actually superhoops?

EDIT: just read his other post

 

MD/20
What is your fascination ?
Do you have a problem ?

 

It's like superhoops came off smack becoming slightly more coherent but remained just as ****ing mental.

 

super hooper, you are very angry. Sky is a very good source of information. What's all this about "wee" Scotland, and "almighty" England. I along with most English people am very modest. And Scotland isn't wee anyway bacuse it is part of the UK which is dominant force in the world. We are one country and one people.
I still don't think Scottish referees are biased and a lot of Celtic fans will agree with me. You know smoking dope makes you paranoid?

 

Some sort of new years resolution?

 

Lennon wants Jay Bothroyd from QPR.