Now you are generalising Toby, almost as much as the Daily Mail and it's like. For every poor sod who needs to work on the side to make ends meet there is some greedy **** with a good lifestyle who claims the cash beacause he has become "accustomed" to it, they try to justify it by saying they are doing no harm when in fact they do a great deal of harm.
I never said it was the same. What I am saying is that something you do, partaking in the hash trade, costs the taxpayers as much, if not more than benefit fraud. Would you disagree with that?
Erm not really, I gave an example and also said I've got issues with people who have no intention of working but still **** the system over. 'A great deal of harm'? You sure? You said you'd grass anyone in that worked whilst claiming benefits, surely that's generalising?
Of course I would. What resources are the Coppers wasting in tracking me down with my ounce a month habit? I'm a consumer not a supplier.
uh huh I seen it, but I didn't really see the point, unless you've got heavy flatulents at the time. <punishment>
either thats still more than ***s you fool ,and 100 a oz more fool you for smoking dogshit and coffee mixed together
Unless you are on the dole and the Taxpayer is subsidising it. There will be a special place in hell for dole scrounging hash smokers
And your point? You think i'm foolish for smoking hash and looking down my nose at dole cheats. I think I can live with your contempt
I do not know the ins and outs of the budgetry spending of Clyde Constabulary Dev, all I am saying is that something you partake in, the Hash trade, costs the Government a lot of money.Weather you are a seller or buyer is neither here nor there, it's illegal and costing me money.
