Thats NOT vanara though is it, vanara is the description I gave you and I would suggest that ifape did become man then shape shifting did indeed takeplace and it must have semed magical. Cant be mythical as it happened according to you The shapeshifting fits yoiur fossil picture like a glove Those are just pictures of skulls, randomly placed on a poster, In no way do they provide a fossilised record of ape becoming man I am referring to the vanara too. It would have been magical to those who didnt evolve etc
What is there to correct? In the context of what you and he were talking about, referring to monkeys was obviously inappropriate.
If we havent been around to observe it then its madeup I gave you the finch example as clarification, you have ignored that in subsequent posts dear lord, wikki again. never mind thats all bubbles. can you outline the fossil record of all of that in pictures?
What?????? And don't give me the fossil record bollocks. If there were a billion fossils all in a row, the likes of you would still go "where is the one between this one and that one?"
If you'd have bothered to quote the entire passage from Wikipedia, rather than the first sentence, then you'd have seen this. "They possessed supernatural powers and could change their shapes." So yes, that is the Vanara. Ok, now go and prove that magic exist and that Hinduism is the true religion and I'll be right on board. You really don't understand how the fossil record works, do you? No. Why would some creatures making noises seem magical?
keep up dimwit yo were claiming BIK was talking to me He was responding to you, and he has confirmed that you were wrong AGAIN
That's possibly the most ridiculous statement that you've ever made and that's saying something. It eliminates your belief in your religion, especially the part about the unchanging Quran, for a start. No, I haven't. You stated a starting point for the finches and have failed to do so with the apes to man evolution, despite me repeatedly asking you to do so. Of all what? I posted the Wikipedia link so that you could pick out which creature you want me to illustrate the evolution of man from. You've failed to do so, again.
No, I haven't. What PNE and I had in mind was different, and that was where I was wrong, but at all times you were still talking nonsense.
as I said evolution is about shape changing in the ape to human context Vanara in terms of description is what I have said, the rest is about the ramayana I dont believe in hinduism and its actually religions rather than religion, however if ape turned into man then shapeshifting occurred explain the fossil record to me please, in your own words, bullet points will do In terms of shape shifting then talking, surely must have seemed magical
