But you still posted a link to him. Do you intend to post links to him in the future or do you now understand he's spouting nonsense?
where have I mentioned spot th eodd one out? I posted that these things all exist, doesnt make it right youre confusing yourself
look back and see why I asked the guy to post what he had problems with so I personally could respond He insists on posting a website that is known for crap so if anything it was like for like
I tell you what, you go first for your version. If you want mine, there are literally thousands of places you can find it. Hey, you can try Wikipedia for a start, or Pharyngula, or..., or..., or... What's the point in me typing it for you when literally thousands of people have spent many hours writing out very clear descriptions. I tell you why you are doing it. Because you are hoping that I'll rush off some hackneyed post glossing over points, throwing in a few accidental errors and then you'll jump to your 'book of errors on evolution as described by Muslim clerics and so-called scientists who have simply been befuddled by their upbringing' and try and use that in response. Well, let's, for a change, not play your game. Instead, you put down your views on evolution because I have no idea where to go to find your particular version on the internet, and we'll discuss that instead.
Why bring him up, then? You posted an hour long clip from him and said that he shares your views. Your other refutations include Ahmed Abd Abdullah, who I can find no trace of. The name seems wrong too, for some reason. I'm going to assume that you know that Tafsir ibn Kathir is a book and not a person. As it's a commentary on the Quran, I don't see how it's a refutation of evolution. Jamal Badawi is qualified in Business Administration, so I'm not sure what his relevance is here, to be honest. I couldn't help but notice that all of your claimed refutations come from sources that Islamic sites frequently point to. It appears that you're taking a religious approach to a scientific question, as any further research into any of these sources shows that they're disputed, at best. At worst they're completely discredited with virtually no effort at all, as you've seen with Naik.
Is this an admission that you cant? you are the one who asked me to go read a book etc. I am quite content with the knowledge I have I already quoted you wikki. Now either man up and put something down or let the the rest of us talk This is/was no game. I made a comment you came back with 'read a book' on evolution. either refute using whatever 'proof' you have or accept its that simple
yes they do sami the ones I think you refer to are the believers who believed before Islam They were muslims ie submitted to the will of Allah
Err, you posted it because you thought it confirmed your views! And I quote: Do you or do you not believe what he is saying?
He may also be referring to those that aren't in a position to believe. If you're mentally incapable or if Islam hasn't reached some far flung region of the world, then presumably you wouldn't expect Allah to damn you to hell.
I wont go point by point as usual I was trying to show the fella the error of posting random links rather than making points himself
