I am the Aiden McGeady of arguers. I win it once, then go back and win it again before leaving a hapless Hun on his arse and striking an unstoppable rocket into the roof of the net
It's true,he was a lovely old cat and I'll mention your name when I bury him min the garden in the morning. <weepswithstiffupperlip>
I don't recall arguing specific points with you too much or at all. I forgot to add that a Hun ref then tries to flag me offside and I have to start again.
Anyway Rebel, did you mention "kettling" when the riots were on? I can't remember, but as Jip said, as it is a term I am not familiar with, I would probably have looked it up. You can tell me, I promise I won't say, mainly because I don't care!
that is twice in one day I have laughed out loud. May his soul and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace.
I thought i had said it when I mentioned it again. I wasn't entirely sure that I had when I became adamant about it but I am absolutely certain I mentioned it when i offered the bet. I didn't think he'd go for it but it is worth a go.
Hahaha, that is another thing about arguments, if you make the other guy think that you think that you are correct, that is usually more than half the battle, but I have to say, I don't think you mentioned it! I could be wrong, but...
If she says no to any winning party for whatever reason the least that would happen would be another election in which similar results would happen. Technically she can refuse legislation that is approved by both Houses but she never does even if it isn't something voted for by the public
I did. I checked. Med Dog is very good though. He has shifted the argument to whether I said something or not when the original argument (that he still thinks he won) has been fully addressed by a government commissioned a report. They spent millions of pounds to reach the same conclusion that I told a buffoon on the internet before the riots even happened. That is some skill he has. Lose an argument and move on and pretend it didn't ever happen. I assume it is deliberate. I'm 2/2 this week for police reports that back my arguments on the internet up.... I am both proud and deeply saddened at the same time.
You think she should give it a go next week when Dave pops over or tea? Do the Gary Lineker face to the england bench when Gazza started bawlin?
I think she should have done it when Labour tried to bring in ID cards even though no one who wasn't a Gestapo wannabe wanted it but she didn't.
Seems old Phil has had heart surgery. "Following tests at Papworth Cardiothoracic Hospital in Cambridge this evening the Duke of Edinburgh was found to have a blocked coronary artery which caused his chest pain," the palace said in a short statement. "This was treated successfully by the minimally invasive procedure of coronary stenting," it added. "Prince Philip will remain in hospital under observation for a short period."
Without links, it means nothing!(And no editing!) Anyway, I think I should sleep now so, I should sign off by saying FTP! Was it you or somebody else that I asked how(after some dizzy bastard i.e. MSP said that they would prosecute people not only in Scotland)they can do such a thing? I am not a lawyer, but one would think that it would be difficult to charge somebody on the inernet under Scottish law, who doesn't live in Scotland? Who does Salmond think he is? The last guy that got too big for his boots was, well...that's for another time completely!
Yes sir, it was this dizzy bastard. They have included in the legislation provisions to go after folk outside Scotland. As it was written in the legislation they could go after me if I were to say "You are a stupid Prod" but they couldn't if I said "Protestantism is stupid because consubstantiation destroys the true spirit of the eucharist and the divine right of succession, as decided by an Act of Parliament is a backwards and counter-Spiritual way of deciding upon the Head of the Church" I couldn't get lifted. "Prods are stupid" lifted "Prods are stupid because" Not lifted. worse than that, if I said "I am going to get in my speedboat, drive it to Monaco, hunt you down ya dirty Hun, chop you up into little pieces and dump your body in the Irish sea on my way home". The Police would have to make a judgement call on whether I meant that or not and if it was worth their while going ahead with it or not. For Med Dog that is cut and dried. 5 years in the nick, but the police may wish to find out whether I have the motivation and capacity to go ahead with it. a) Do I have a speedboat b) Could that speedboat have reached Monaco c) Do I have the ability/capacity to hunt you down d) Do I have the implements to cut you up. e) Do I have the finances to buy implements to cut you up if I don't f) Do I know that although the shortest route as the crow flies is via the Irish sea, prevailing currents and shipping lanes dictate the Atlantic as the best route even then....I could just be kidding. Sorry for the rant, but this legislation is utter madness. The whole premise of the legislation is based on a lie. A very demonstrable lie as well and one that people don't really give a **** about but it appeals to the pedant in me. The Scottish Police website cites as "fact" that "85% of people agree that sectarianism should be a criminal offence".......Naw they didnae.... 85% of people think sectarianism is a criminal offence. even if there isn't enough in current legislation to get folk being sectarian, there is no rationale presented for all this "offensive behaviour" ****e. I cannot believe that legislation this stupid is being introduced....again sorry for the rant, but to tie it up nicely.....ish. Lizzie has to sign off on this. If Phil dies, maybe she will be too distraught to do it.....Ironically, Phil is the only hope left for common sense.
