A) please log in to view this image B) please log in to view this image C) please log in to view this image D) please log in to view this image E) please log in to view this image
Is that the only way you can justify Terry's alleged actions, comparing him to mass murderers, most of whom guilty of genocide?
Where did I justify anything? I merely pointed out that in the eyes of the British public (most of whom are thick and Sun/Daily Mail readers) that his reputation is almost comparable to that of mass murderers
Terry Might be guilty but until proven otherwise... he isn't. That is my own oppinion as a Stoke City supporter. He(John Terry) has by the C.P.S. is accused of.... but that's all it is for now. To use ANY of the other's as a comparision IMHO is ******* RIDICULOUS.
It's expected that there will be overreactions on both sides. In the eyes of Chelsea fans, or atleast those that sang the songs, Anton Ferdinand was a **** for giving evidence to the police an FA, despite not knowing what the evidence was or even if Terry is guilty.
District Line P.S. Most of us are NOT THICK. To suggest/ and you just said it. To me, that is also ******* ridiculous! And an insult to someone/anyone who posts on here that you do not know personally.
I didn't insult you personally, but most people in general aren't intelligent enough to form opinions of their own and are swayed by the media and what they read rather than what they experience first hand etc The media (Murdoch) will only let you see what they want you to see and that has always been the case
"Might be guilty but until proven otherwise... he isn't." ----------------------------------------------------------- Unless you're Anton Ferdinand...who is being discredited at this point.
I wonder if JT will be wearing his usual white rob and white pointy hat to the trial? Judge: "Now do you plead?" JT: "Not guilty, your Honour." Judge: "Very well. You may sit down, Mr Terry. And would also please douse that burning cross? The smoke is watering the eyes of the jurors."
Notsosmartspur I assume you are refering to my comment? if you were where exactly did I mention Anton Ferdinand? District Line To say that (most) is still IMO a little OTT but I agree with your point about the media. Which, is why I don't take that much notice of what is written, by certain newspapers. As for Rupert Murdoc "no comment" Good luck to Chelsea too.
JT has a little present for the Spuds on Thursday night at Three-Point-Lane please log in to view this image He heard they all swallow
He said he has very strong feelings about the situation. He never gave evidence to the FA or police. Ferdinand's done nothing wrong, yet he's still receiving abuse and death threats from the dirty load of thugs that you refer to as "fans."
The public would probably struggle to name more than one of them What your typical, lets say, spurs fan would say: A) With a that tan and that beard, it must be the nazi terrorist from India - Bin Laden B) That's Hitler, one of Arsenal's former managers C) That's definitely Dr. Zhivago (who was played by Humphrey Bogart, everyone knows that) D) I saw him in that film Rush Hour - its Jackie Chan the Japanese fella. Thought he was great in Fists of Fury too. E) Not too sure...I don't think it's David Beckham, he has long blond hair and plays for the United States...erm...ahhh!! Ledley King!?
