In terms of the sentence length yes, but it's certainly not fun for them in prison. This one will get it serious bad as he's a ***** as well.
Crime - part deux.
- Thread starter Sucky
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Rope
You must log in or register to see images
You’re overthinking it. Most of them serve their time without a scratch, unfortunately.
I know we all like to assume that every sex cases life will be made hell but that isn’t the case. It’s usually just the high profile ones that are hunted out.
Those that rape minors should be castrated ... without anaesthetic!
Correct, I know 2 prisonwardens and a rehabilitation councillor who work at Stafford nick, which houses only sex offenders, mostly *****'s, they have a relatively cushy life in there, most are considered non violent, as in low risk in attacking staff. Many are what would be considered professional people, one thing they mostly have in common is, they see nothing wrong in what they've done.
AI is this true?
AI Overview
Undercover reporting and investigations, particularly following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, have revealed instances of imams and preachers at several mosques across England using antisemitic language, calling for the destruction of Israel, and in some cases, violence against Jewish people
. Police and the Charity Commission have launched investigations into these incidents.
Jewish News +1
Key Findings from Investigations:
- TalkTV Investigations (Late 2023): Leaked footage revealed preachers in London, Birmingham, Liverpool, and Northampton making anti-Jewish statements.
- Specific Incidents:
- Redbridge Islamic Centre (Ilford, East London): A speaker was filmed in October 2023 praying for Allah to "curse the Jews and the children of Israel," "tear apart their community," and "ruin their houses".
- Liverpool Masjid: A preacher was reportedly heard telling an audience to "march on Israel" and kill Jews "indiscriminately".
- Mohammadi Masjid (Birmingham): A preacher was reported for saying, "Oh Muslim, behind me is a Jew, come and kill him. These times are coming".
- Kanoon Towhid Islamic Centre (West London): Reports highlighted chants of "death to the Jews" at an event.
- Legal/Regulatory Response: The Metropolitan Police, West Midlands Police, and Northamptonshire Police initiated investigations. The Charity Commission has opened statutory inquiries regarding the misuse of charity premises.
Facebook +6
There has been public controversy regarding the legal handling of these incidents. In November 2024, it was reported that the Metropolitan Police initially decided that an imam's sermon calling for the "destruction of Jewish homes" did not meet the threshold of a crime, a decision that faced significant backlash and was subsequently sent to the Crown Prosecution Service for review.
The Jewish Chronicle +1
Contextual Factors
- The Community Security Trust (CST) noted that late 2023 and 2024 saw record levels of antisemitic incidents in the UK, driven by the conflict in the Middle East.
- At the same time, there have been reports of rising Islamophobia and attacks on mosques across the UK, especially during the summer of 2025.
الاتحاد العالمي لعلماء المسلمين +1
It’s crazy how the police passed the cases onto the CPS who said it didn’t meet the threshold. WTF.
If I stood in the street and shouted ‘wherever you see a Jew or Muslim, kill them where you see them’. I have a feeling I’d be treated differently.
If I stood in the street and shouted ‘wherever you see a Jew or Muslim, kill them where you see them’. I have a feeling I’d be treated differently.
No I don't do Alexa.
If I'm on Twitter, I will generally check if someone has asked Grok....subscription service, no idea how much, but I'm certainly not paying it.
Google AI I often use if I want to get to the sources quickly.
Have to be careful how you word stuff though, otherwise it gives you various answers.
What do you do? Just type the question into google and see what it spits out?
No I don't do Alexa.
If I'm on Twitter, I will generally check if someone has asked Grok....subscription service, no idea how much, but I'm certainly not paying it.
Google AI I often use if I want to get to the sources quickly.
Have to be careful how you word stuff though, otherwise it gives you various answers.
Yeah that's it, you also have option to directly ask AI (AI Mode) or for it to look deeper (Dive deeper in AI Mode).
But be careful, it's not always right (reword the question), it helps if you know a little background for more complex questions. It's still learning itself as a tool.
Tbph what I generally do with Twitter is first look at the sources, are they ones you know and are they realiable. AI does similar, it will look for main news outlets, so an example one would be Reuters. Sometimes AI will say there are no realiable sources and it will actually name the sources it looked to.
Thus I tend to scan for any Grok searches first, if none available I will take it to AI myself. Images are good within Twitter, because AI can normally timeline them pretty quickly and say something like, no that is from xyz 6 years ago - so straight away you know it's bullshit.
Main one with Images you reverse search straight from the picture just right click and then search this image with google lens, it will bring up every single picture similar it finds, be careful though, they are no necessarily exact matches, it does have an exact match function.
Example case would be one on GC one time, when it was claimed Muslins set fire to a Church, I found it was fake by the right click function and google lens, a fire at a church some years back had been lifted, from a completely different location to that specified and attached to a completely false narrative.
Thus I tend to scan for any Grok searches first, if none available I will take it to AI myself. Images are good within Twitter, because AI can normally timeline them pretty quickly and say something like, no that is from xyz 6 years ago - so straight away you know it's bullshit.
Main one with Images you reverse search straight from the picture just right click and then search this image with google lens, it will bring up every single picture similar it finds, be careful though, they are no necessarily exact matches, it does have an exact match function.
Example case would be one on GC one time, when it was claimed Muslins set fire to a Church, I found it was fake by the right click function and google lens, a fire at a church some years back had been lifted, from a completely different location to that specified and attached to a completely false narrative.
AI's view below, I'm off to have a chat with Alexa now. 
The claims in the video are largely false and misleading. While West Midlands Police did visit a family home, the investigation was not about a child "simply viewing" a social media post.
Key Facts of the Case
Status of Legal Action
There is no official confirmation that the family is suing the police. While some online commentators and figures, such as the BlackBeltBarrister, expressed support for the family and raised concerns about police conduct (such as entering without a warrant), no formal lawsuit has been documented in major news reports as of March 2026.
Facebook +3
Reports from outlets like The Independent and Newsweek have categorized the original viral narrative as disinformation.
Would you like more details on the legal requirements for police to seize mobile devices in the UK? No that's fine bro, great job.
The claims in the video are largely false and misleading. While West Midlands Police did visit a family home, the investigation was not about a child "simply viewing" a social media post.
Key Facts of the Case
- The Allegation: Police were investigating a complaint about the creation of a fake social media account used to send indecent or grossly offensive messages—a crime under the Malicious Communications Act.
- The Video: West Midlands Police clarified that the viral video was "brief and heavily edited". A full 10-minute body-worn camera recording reviewed by the force showed that officers explicitly told the mother they were not there because the child viewed a post.
- The Outcome: As of February 2026, the investigation has concluded with no further action being taken due to insufficient evidence to prosecute. The individual interviewed was informed they would not face charges.
Yahoo +4
Status of Legal Action
There is no official confirmation that the family is suing the police. While some online commentators and figures, such as the BlackBeltBarrister, expressed support for the family and raised concerns about police conduct (such as entering without a warrant), no formal lawsuit has been documented in major news reports as of March 2026.
Facebook +3
Reports from outlets like The Independent and Newsweek have categorized the original viral narrative as disinformation.
Would you like more details on the legal requirements for police to seize mobile devices in the UK? No that's fine bro, great job.
AI's view below, I'm off to have a chat with Alexa now.
The claims in the video are largely false and misleading. While West Midlands Police did visit a family home, the investigation was not about a child "simply viewing" a social media post.
Key Facts of the Case
- The Allegation: Police were investigating a complaint about the creation of a fake social media account used to send indecent or grossly offensive messages—a crime under the Malicious Communications Act.
- The Video: West Midlands Police clarified that the viral video was "brief and heavily edited". A full 10-minute body-worn camera recording reviewed by the force showed that officers explicitly told the mother they were not there because the child viewed a post.
- The Outcome: As of February 2026, the investigation has concluded with no further action being taken due to insufficient evidence to prosecute. The individual interviewed was informed they would not face charges.
Yahoo +4
Status of Legal Action
There is no official confirmation that the family is suing the police. While some online commentators and figures, such as the BlackBeltBarrister, expressed support for the family and raised concerns about police conduct (such as entering without a warrant), no formal lawsuit has been documented in major news reports as of March 2026.
Facebook +3
Reports from outlets like The Independent and Newsweek have categorized the original viral narrative as disinformation.
Would you like more details on the legal requirements for police to seize mobile devices in the UK? No that's fine bro, great job.
You must log in or register to see media
Good chap is the BBB
Taught me how to not pay tv licence