Labour's even managed to lose Peston. The critical evidence from David Miles and Tom Joseph to the Treasury Select Committee is 1) the Treasury permanent secretary, James Bowler, not the Chancellor, authorised the publication of the OBR letter. That contradicted Treasury briefings that there had been or would be wild swings in its forecasts - which suggests a gap or even tension between the “official” Treasury and the “political” Treasury 2) the OBR was deeply troubled by an impression created in the media that somehow the OBR was fiddling the figures to help the Chancellor, which is why it wrote that letter. Before it wrote the letter, and over a period of weeks, the OBR told the Treasury it was concerned a false impression of the public finances was being presented in the media - a false impression that was not corrected until the day of the budget. 3) the OBR hated what looked like partial leaks to the media of the fiscal analysis it was delivering to the Treasury. It insists it was not responsible for these leaks 4) there was no no new information about higher tax receipts given to the Chancellor in November when she made her u-turn on increasing the basic rate of income tax - even though government officials briefed journalists such new information had been presented to the Treasury only days before the u-turn. That said, Miles in effect endorses the Chancellor’s decision to raise taxes by £26bn in order to more than double the fiscal headroom - the buffer against shocks - to £22bn. The disagreement between the OBR and the political Treasury is not over what the Chancellor actually did in the budget. It is about what journalists, voters and investors understood for weeks before the budget about the health of the public finances and how the OBR’s assessment was changing - which the OBR saw as seriously wrong.
We should send all the gammons to die in Ukraine & let the Pakis take over the UK . At least we wouldn't have to care about Christmas or Christians anymore in December. Vote Labour for war & ethnic cleansing
"we" already are one colour, white ya dribbling spastic anything non white will not be "us" and why do you want to merge with 65 IQ people anyway? you really think thats going to improve the world?
It's just another claim the boring, attention seeking tit makes that they can never back up with credible evidence when challenged. They're just just another typical, ******ed lefty.
Now we’ve learned from OBR testimony to the Commons today that it warned the Treasury about briefing out “misconceptions” about a black hole in the public finances before the Budget. Professor David Miles of the OBR told MPs that leaks to the press from within the Treasury wrongly suggested that the watchdog’s forecasts were fluctuating wildly as Rachel Reeves laid the groundwork for tax rises. The Chancellor and her spinners repeatedly exaggerated a multi-billion-pound hole in the public finances to justify her £30bn tax raid as a crucial repair job, rather than a benefits spending spree designed to placate the Labour backbenches. Miles added that Budget leaks from the Treasury “exacerbated” uncertainty in the markets and may have damaged growth. https://x.com/afneil/status/1995853956979814401
If you can't have babies then you don't care about the future . Angela Merkel was happy to **** over the entire continent because of suicidal empathy too
its not remotely inevitable, the africans wouldnt even have made it out of africa without help, all you have to do is put them back theyll be stuck there for millions of years the races have developed over millennia and merging them requires unfathomable effort over hundreds of years maintenance of races is inevitable with no sabotage and the white race is the only one thats under attack in any case one colour = white extinction diversity = less whites
Some people don't seem to be able to handle cold hard facts. Maybe these Christian types should try and breed, pump out more white babies to delay the inevitable.
warm soft delusions we could exterminate the rest of the non white world if we wanted to britain could be 99% white in 3 years if we wanted it to be it will be a choice to go extinct if it happens to think its some sort of force of nature thats just desperate to undo the last million years of evolution is a failure of the most basic logic which goes to show how the ideological indoctrination bypassed your admittedly limited logical capacity
Were the Indians, South East Asians and African leaders, or their equally absurd self-loathing leftist *****s, of days gone by, happy to stand by as THEIR people were displaced, harmed and discriminated against, as European colonial powers swept the globe to civilise them? Why are the nihilistic, Godless, self-hating, brainwashed and childless leftist scum, wanting to see the country become an Islamic-ruled country hostile to the people who have had their ancestry here since forever? The double-standards of these ****s is absolutely breathtaking. And I bet they are ugly bastards too because they ALWAYS are.
I can understand the theory that eventually we will all be one global race/colour/ethnicity when everyone has interbred but how shallow will the gene pool be and how low will the average IQ go when we are welcoming cousin ****ers to the party? I've told Grove Junior and Junior Senior that if they expect me to be pushing a half wog around in a pram and pretend that I am an overjoyed grand parent that they have got another thing coming. please log in to view this image
