I mean that’s all just supposition from a right leaning organisation. Doesn’t actually say or research anything concrete. Also it’s from 2021 so could be well out of date in regards trustees etc.
I'd love to think everything is hunky dory and transparent, but i don't. Suspect we won't see eye to eye, which is fine.
I'm always quite interested in contrary views because I think those who espouse them do so in the knowledge there is at the very least reputational damage - they often risk that if not professional status, earning potential too.
I don't know, there are plenty of organisations (and individuals) who will pay people handsomely these days even if their views/opinions end up being complete crackpot. It can be a very lucrative business these days.
True, I didn't say I believe them all But even if they are being paid there's probably still jeopardy if they take a position that they can't walk back.
It’s appreciating that the more any organisation or function state or otherwise will tend towards its common political status based on who it employs . If the BBC was now awash with right wing leaning people then its antics would lean that way . If they collectively don’t like Trumps politics then maybe they will fake news something ? Oh hang on !…
BBC Verify and Marianna Spring are not straight up*. There you go. *Unless you're a nutjob. Corrected for you.
