Off Topic Starmer/ Reeves: last man standing

Yet you responded to one? Interesting

 

Not trying to trap you at all mate.
I’m trying to find out where you wouldn’t accept it.
What if she said she was going to take half your salary, would you agree?
I was happy with 2, if people want more that’s entirely up to them but I don’t want to pay for them.
Maybe just people who think like you should volunteer to pay for them. I have no problem with that.

 

It probably just looks like me arguing with myself

 

Yet you seem fine to go down the road of calling me a Farage supporter,
You seem to be a hypocritical twat as well.

 

Fair enough.

Im reading the book Entitled at the moment. I would recommend all to read this book to give a greater understanding of our Royal Family and the costs of this scratter family. They certainly need more work and some of their benefits stopped imho.

However as we still live in a civil society I can’t voluntarily stop funding them like you can’t stop funding things you don’t want. As aside a dysfunctional workshy family in a palace is costing us a hell of a lot more than one in a council house.

At the risk of going round in circles, I agree with you as we do fundamentally need to address supporting families who keep producing children with no means to support them.

Getting people into work, with a carrot and then a stick if needs be and financially educating kids is the key but not letting kids go hungry in the meantime is sensible imho. If that makes me a tit, twat or mag (the slur I can’t stand) fair enough.

off now have a good day.

 

If you are not I apologise, obviously a few on here are.

Call me a twat by all means but please not a mag.

 

You too,
You can maybe answer the question when you get back.

 

4 and 1 maybe according to PRS, not enough to get him in I don’t think.