The batting was woeful because they insist on doing the same thing regardless of the opponent or conditions. They didn’t take into account the pace and bounce of Australian wickets or the skill of the bowlers. They didn’t take the turn into account in India or the skill of their spinners. Bazball doesn’t seem to be able to take account of opponents or conditions. It’s madness when those conditions are largely unfamiliar. Can’t their tactics adapt to take these things into account?
Weak excuse, I am afraid - and if they are it is down to the lack of preparation and match fitness. Going into an Ashes series with a single 3 day game against a mid-level English opposition is no way to get ready for Australia on home turf. Amateur hour!!
FFS!! BBC News - The Ashes: England will not send first-choice batters to pink-ball tour game - BBC Sport https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/cz94pz4eqy1o
The art of test cricket is dying thanks to the 20/20 slog fest culture so seems like they can’t seem to think about these technicalities like they did back in the day.
The problem with England cricket is England itself. Or what the great Boycott once called "English conditions" . Elsewhere, the pitches are going to be bare clay-baked in a hot sun all game. The only thing that changes them is the "wear and tear" of the bowlers feet towards day 5. So the local bowlers are forced to produce (with metronomic accuracy) "line and length" , "pitching into the rough" etc. They do not have the luxury of slightly wayward deliveries suddenly being transformed by the moisture of either pitch or air into wicket takers. In the 80s, I remember during "off season" non-international squad players off duty would go to Oz and play club cricket, At least then they would get more experience of playing in those locales should they get selected for overseas tour duties.