no you mentioned liverpool and blame and police stadium UEFA thats why I came to that conclusion, like I said, if I got it arseways dont pay it no mind
I was just stating that it always someone else fault, whatever teh case when connected to the whole city of liverpool, i am not just talking about the mediocre football team
I dunno - maybe Monday is the day they set aside to review disciplinary events from the weekend? Or maybe the clubs don't want them potentially dragging Suarez and Evra back in on their day off? The day after the match is usually a recovery day for the players, and with the busy Xmas schedule coming up I guess they want them to have all the rest they can? Or they're just a bunch of lazy ****s Of course it can. If the evidence was conclusive the case would have been decided by now, one way or the other. The only reason they can need extra time is if the situation is even less conclusive than they originally thought! QED.
So a guy from the ex "capital of culture" lol thinks that a man racially abused for being blaack should be banned?
wtf You take Numpty to a whole new level They are guilty of nothing more than trying to piss each other off and paddy went too far imo. Should have taken it as he gave it and got on with it. Both have baggage.. and they are swiniging it at each other
dont think they would have to drag them back on monday if they are working all weekend on a decision - the only reason to bring them back on monday would be to give a decision and i'm sure both players would be happier to know on monday rather than tuesday or as you say they might just be lazy ****s topping up the expenses over the weekend
if you were in Saudi and got arrested for swigging whisky in public, would you be able to get off citing "cultural differences"?
Great logic there Einstein. If there's no evidence you don't bring a charge in the first place. If there's little or no evidence presented at a trial, it gets thrown out/dismissed, not extended several times its original length. The only "reason" for the delay is the case is more complex than originally thought, or there's a lot more evidence being presented than anticipated. Your assertion that this is all some kind of FA conspiracy to save face (Why? they aren't charged with anything), and that it proves a lack of evidence is severely flawed. Almost as flawed as your use of the phrase QED.
Thanks Pretty much what I said. Congratulations. Are you on drugs? At which point did I say this was an FA conspiracy?!? And I didn't say there was a lack of evidence, I said the evidence is inconclusive. They mean different things, you know?
Why are you such a twat? Evra has a history of playing the race card and all of a sudden it's cast iron that Suarez was racist towards him! And also on the other post you made, it's never LIverpools fault, I think by mentioning the architect of the stadium indicates exactly what you were referring to. If you want to make claims, be a man and say it how you think it, if not then you need to keep it shut - The slander is getting a little bit monotinous!!!
What the hell has happened to this thread. What on earth has Harold shipman/Heysel got to do with this case.