Crime - part deux.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should crime happen

  • Go on then why not.

  • Yes

  • Stfu sucky

  • Tobes and peej welch couple

  • Suck Roy's tits


Results are only viewable after voting.
You won't see this on the bbc news but if you did the headline would probably read something like.... 'man has to break up with 12yr old girlfriend due to racist white middle aged people"
You must log in or register to see media
 
32 yr old just been charged with rape an other not named offences.
All the Muslim mp's are all over this on Twatter.

Very quickly labeled a Racially motivated rape.


Shame that all those same mp's voted against a grooming gang inquiry tho so they can go **** themselves and thier selective outrage
 
All the Muslim mp's are all over this on Twatter.

Very quickly labeled a Racially motivated rape.


Shame that all those same mp's voted against a grooming gang inquiry tho so they can go **** themselves and thier selective outrage

Are you sure theyre not sikh mate, 2 midland attacks on sikh girls, not that far apart, police not linking them though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
You must log in or register to see media

I understand that the reason the inquiry broke down is because of claims Labour have tried to convolute it, when I say Labour I mean Starmer specifically. I'll also repeat again that Jess needs to step aside, she's out of her depth and is letting politics blind her.

Grooming games is extremely organised and as Trevor said in that clip they are protected and this is on an Industrial scale.

What I'd like to know is who are they protecting at the top, how many to be more precise.

I understand Farage is going to take this to the Commons and Lords, well I'm sorry but my thought process to that is why the Lords, they look after their own, I don't think he understands this either in truth if he is thinking like that, unless...oh no let's not go there.

I think when this gets blown open it will be as big as the Epstein case, who is Starmer protecting, why as a barrister can he not see the problem or maybe he can and he's scared of the consequences. Why is Jess Phillips not seeing it or again maybe she is and she's being guided in a certain direction.

Let's just focus on the grooming games, not convolute it, bring the big ole elephant into the room and if it's proved nothing more than we are a bunch of middle aged racists, I'd rather be called that than to help those who want to mess with our kids by turning a blind eye, through fear of being called names.
 
Was a story in our local rag earlier, which has been taken down oddly, of a bloke who was convicted two counts of rape of a child under 13 and another charge of sexual assault and got 30 months.

30 months FFS. ****ing disgraceful that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
So that guy who escaped custody after raping a kid was deported this morning...


With 500 quid in his pocket for his trouble.

You must log in or register to see images



Update.

He refused to get on the plane apparently it took 5 people to get him on there and the £500 payment was made to butter him up to **** off.

So he comes here illegally, gets everything he needs for free, rapes a kid or two and gets 12months for it, serves one month, gets released for 2 days by accident, gets caught again, refuses to get on a plane until we pay him 5bills.

We got all that Yeh? <laugh>
 
Last edited:
So that guy who escaped custody after raping a kid was deported this morning...


With 500 quid in his pocket for his trouble.

You must log in or register to see images

The discretionary decision was made by the people deporting him to ensure he went peacefully, otherwise it would have cost more. It's a case of we don't like it but it is what it is bro and for £500 I'm happy to see rid of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
The discretionary decision was made by the people deporting him to ensure he went peacefully, otherwise it would have cost more. It's a case of we don't like it but it is what it is bro and for £500 I'm happy to see rid of him.
So... Uk government held to ransom by an illegal rapist.

Make it make sense bro <laugh>
 
So... Uk government held to ransom by an illegal rapist.

Make it make sense bro <laugh>

It wasn't anything to do with politicians.

All he had to do was say I'm not going and I want a lawyer, then he would have been put back inside and cost the taxpayer an absolute fortune, or we could have done it your way and tied him up before lobbing him in the cargo hold, but that would have all cost more money, in cancelled flight, rebooked flight and parachute, the latter being an optional extra at £500.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
It wasn't anything to do with politicians.

All he had to do was say I'm not going and I want a lawyer, then he would have been put back inside and cost the taxpayer an absolute fortune, or we could have done it your way and tied him up before lobbing him in the cargo hold, but that would have all cost more money, in cancelled flight, rebooked flight and parachute, the latter being an optional extra at £500.
Whole thing is Farcical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
I was on a flight one time that was deporting someone, they kicked off so the flight couldn't take off....stuff like that costs **** loads of money, and they they have to be removed by the cops, as well as border force, which cost even more **** loads of money.