Liverpool say isak is okay to play 2 games in last boredom break for Sweden but then Slot says hes not fit after the boredom break due to us and the pre season, not bad advice from Liverpool allowing Sweden to play the isak twice Those comments.
He didn't say that at all. He said he came back fit. Because he came back fit, he played 72 minutes against man utd straight after coming back from the national team and started the very next game (yesterday). You can have an opinion but don't just make stuff up.
You all don’t seem to clued up about your Club. So, as requested, article (click on link) with quotes in. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/arne-slot-makes-smaller-club-32735446
He did say smaller club, fair enough - I think that’s unnecessary too for what it’s worth. But the rest of your original point is waffle. At the end of that biased article he says himself that we were fine with Sweden playing him twice and he was fit to do so, so where has he contradicted anyone? He seems to suggest it’s down to player profiles: some crack on, others get niggles
My point is why is he even mentioning Newcastle regardless as to why is he trying trying to have a dig at Newcastle. We are out of the picture as far as Isak is concerned. So what is the point or purpose of his comment. Just makes him, and Liverpool by association, look petty. No need in my view.
Newcastle are a smaller club. The only time Liverpool can't call someone a smaller club its when Real Madrid...
Your point is tedious at best. He was asked about Isak's fitness and he answered. You just don't like the 'smaller club' comment; truth hurts?
Well, it seems that you're not too concerned that we are living rent free in your manager's head. We beat you in a Cup Final and he's obsessed with us.
i watch games , watch for transfer action and general stuff around the club but i don't bother with the "noise" which is generated these days PS you are a smaller club
How do you know Slot meant Newcastle I took it to mean the club that Isak went off to actually train with - not the team he didn’t train with Newcastle didn’t cross my mind once ? I didn’t really follow all of this tbf but it seems like you are on here to get a bite more than talk sensibly I didn’t really want Isak, though I do feel we needed more than one striker
I'd still like to know where Slot said what you claimed - "when Slot says hes not fit after the boredom break" - that's just not true, he didn't say that at all. How could he go straight into the game against man utd and play 72 minutes if he wasn't fit? As for Newcastle living rent free in his head . He didn't actually even say Newcastle at all. He said players coming from smaller clubs need a different level of fitness. You could take that comment as a general comment which is true or you could take it as specifically about Isak and the club he's just left and it's still true. I love the opening line of that article btw. "Slot suggesting Newcastle are a smaller club." Of course they are. Just admit you're obsessed with Isak and his move here. You were on here, probably for the first time ever, when all the palaver was going on prior to his move. Most of us didn't want him anyway for various reasons which we told you at the time. I think it's time for you to move on mate.
