Yeah because the wins under SB were down to others and not him.
I decide when it's ok. Ok. And at the moment it's not ok. Ok.
So when a side wins it's the players that get the credit and when they lose it's the players fault?
Yeah because the wins under SB were down to others and not him.
I decide when it's ok. Ok. And at the moment it's not ok. Ok.
Nope never said that.So when a side wins it's the players that get the credit and when they lose it's the players fault?
Nope
So just seeking some clarification on all this, but that means the manager gets the credit for wins or good results and the manager should therefor be open to criticism for defeats?
SB never impacted upon any single game. He had no plan A let alone a plan B. He was fortunate for ASM playing well for 5 minutes here and there. When ASM was **** we as a team tended to be ****.
Not going to respond any more as you clearly understand but you're just being antagonistic because you're bored.
Last Champions League campaign Howe was lambasted for the injuries become he just stuck with his favourites and didn’t rotateSteve Bruce was chased out. I've not seen anyone saying sack Howe. I've not seen anyone saying he shouldn't rotate either, only people highlighting the fact his in game management and changes are never very good if ever at all.
How's that? He picked the sides and tactics? I'm just pointing out that I'm not going to take any lessons from people that couldn't credit previous managers after wins... I'm fair mate.. I'm not a hater.
Not being antagonistic I'm just annoying you, because you know I credit when due and vice versa.
Last Champions League campaign Howe was lambasted for the injuries become he just stuck with his favourites and didn’t rotate
We've discussed SB a million times but you keep saying you give him credit but no credit is due. Yes he picked teams but please tell me apart from pass it to ASM and pray what were these tactics? How come our players were so unfair they were blowing out their arse after 20 minutes. You know all this hence the antagonism
Rotating will always be difficult and won’t always workIs someone saying he shouldn't be rotating? He definitely should, but it has to work. He will be fully aware he's judged on results.
Question changes etc should be perfectly acceptable... Hating on him is another level.. I don't do that.. I didn't even with Bruce.. I didn't like all that.. It was nasty stuff imo.
Steve Bruce was chased out. I've not seen anyone saying sack Howe. I've not seen anyone saying he shouldn't rotate either, only people highlighting the fact his in game management and changes are never very good if ever at all.
Steve Bruce was chased out. I've not seen anyone saying sack Howe. I've not seen anyone saying he shouldn't rotate either, only people highlighting the fact his in game management and changes are never very good if ever at all.
You must log in or register to see images
I’ve had a quick look through and cannot find a single post asking for him to be sacked and because of last season he absolutely shouldn’t be.
What I can find, which is repetitive and therefore could be seen as boring, is question marks over the managers in game management and use of subs. This links to questions over the recruitment and the quality of the squad.
In all likelihood Howe will turn it around, but I personally think it feels a little different this season. The regression of certain players needs to be halted immediately. Hopefully when we get some players back it’ll improve but the Tino injury is incredibly bad timing as Hall is who knows where and Trippier has looked woeful.
Constant criticism, saying he has to change and then saying it’s his final season is chasing himAnd?
“Time to realise that Howe isn’t the man”What am I looking at?
“Time to realise that Howe isn’t the man”
“Time to give Eddie the credit he deserves which is total failure “
Not saying he should be sacked?
I read that as his changes resulted in failure...gg will need to confirm