You're windmilling now because your 'context' stance has been rubbished... No unlawful deaths are ever 'worth it' ... the end ... there is no 'excuse by context'...
That's literally not what I've said at all? My point is this: Internet causes lots of children to suffer CSE, indisputable fact. Banning it would prevent a lot of that happening, also indisputable fact. Therefore if people don't want the internet banned, they're happy to accept that these things will happen to keep the perceived benefits the internet brings? In principle exactly the same as this yank mush (who again I didn't agree with), just with a different thing. I never said you personally using the internet is dangerous.
Someone walking into a school and aiming a computer in the direction of the kids and hitting the tab key repeatedly won't kill anyone ... Someone walking into a school with a fully loaded automatic rifle ... There is no equivalence ...
No I'm not. I've said lots of times I don't agree him. Fair point on the use of the word happy. Poor choice of word.
Makes you wonder how much that would reduce by if guns weren't so readily available? Not saying that the same individuals wouldn't seek other means - but no denying a) it wouldn't be as easy, and b) deaths by shooting would dramatically decrease...
Why are you posting nonsensical examples and basically making things up I've not said? It's very dishonest of you. Which of these three statements do you disagree with: Internet causes lots of children to suffer CSE, indisputable fact. Banning it would prevent a lot of that happening, also indisputable fact. Therefore if people don't want the internet banned, they're willing to accept that these things will happen to keep the perceived benefits the internet brings?
No it hasn’t. You have just tried to ignore the context because you’re delighted this guy has been killed. It’s you who is windmilling, you won’t give up what you enjoy even tho kids are being abused but are condemning people who want guns because you have no interest in them.
Fair admittance ... I'm 100% behind ANYTHING that would make society both safer and more humanitarian...
Nope I highlighted the context - the second amendment is solely concerned with the right to bear arms - the comments made were that 'some deaths' to protect that right every year are 'worth it' ... If there is anything factually incorrect I what I've written, please point it out...
