The fact that she is still in post and not sent packing sadly says everything you need to know about this Starmer administration.
If only somebody got video footage of him saying "Yiddos!" on the pitch during Ledders' testimonial, Mandelson would have never allowed him in his cabinet
Getting Mad Nads to so publicly join Reform has got to be the cleverest way to scuttle the Frog-faced Führers Fascists!
I honestly thought that it would be impossible for me to dislike this ghoul more, but I was wrong ... The worrying thing is that you know this 'speech' is drafted with No. 10, so reflects the Governments policy to the letter. https://news.sky.com/story/mandelso...and-paint-brexit-as-liberating-force-13425899
"He wasn't having a threesome with a 26 year old, he was akshually n FBI informant on Epstein" - the current White House line Don't suppose Agent 47 will be in London in a couple of weeks...?
Evangelos Marinakis is now such a massive bellend that he's making Boris Johnson look good. EM: "What I would prefer is for children to stop dying and let Russia keep parts of Ukraine." BJ: "Which pieces of Ukraine would you give away? Which pieces of Czechoslovakia would you give to Hitler? How much of Poland?" Marinakis wants to stop funding Ukraine to supposedly stop the war. Another ****ing crook that's also a Putin stooge. What a shock.
Good news for mini roundabouts: Djed Spence did not become the first Muslim to play for England this evening
A summary of Graham Linehan's defence in court Just a reminder: Starmer publicly defended this **** • Turned up to day one of court and stood outside for photos wearing a sandwich board with anti-trans slogans on. • Him and his lawyer stated that they were going to use he/him pronouns for SB throughout discussion and testimony. This causes confusion later on in the trial, obviously. • In between day one and day two of the trial he broke the conditions of his bail by (some suspect drunkenly) tweeting a reply to one of his followers at 5am. • Admitted to posting a photo of the teenage SB to his twitter account with 600,000+ followers and asking them to identify her, find out what course she does at which uni, etc. • Clarified he repeatedly referred to SB as "Tarquin" because she's "posh". Supporters in the public gallery laughed in support at this. • Admitted to grabbing the phone off SB, holding it behind his back, then "skimming" it "like a frisbee" into the road and saying "get your ****ing phone" after the teenager asked him why he'd called her a "domestic terrorist". Said he knew it was a bad idea immediately, and then had his own tweets bragging about how proud he was about it read back to him. [I will remind you at this point that this trial is to determine whether he assaulted a teenager and damaged her property] • Told the court the same thing that he always says - he lost his wife, friends, comedy colleagues and career because of bullying "trans rights activists". • Repeatedly told to stay focused by his own defence counsel, because he kept trying to go on rants about The Transes etc. • His defence called for a dismissal of the trial, which was rejected by the judge. They also submitted some last minute evidence, which was a video from twitter that got dismissed. He was then cross examined by the prosecutor. • Confirmed he called the teenage SB a sadist, homophobic, misogynistic sociopath to his followers while sharing her picture, and confirmed he still believes this repeatedly. • Admitted to saying that SB (17 years old at the time) is a "sissy porn watch[er]". Confirmed that he is very familiar with sissy porn, more-so than the claimaint's KC. Also mentioned "hypno sissy porn". Implied that this is how people get trans'd. • Asked the prosecution to define "transgender". Asked her if she really believes SB is a woman. Was reminded by the judge that this isn't what the trial is about. • Implied that the teenager he assaulted is lying about her age, and has faked her ID documents to make herself seem younger. He was reminded that these legal documents have been verified by the court - he was still adamant they weren't real and that the law is working with trans rights activists. • Said that he previously handed in a 400 page document of tweets to the police and they didn't do anything with it because it was too much evidence for them to handle. • Said he doesn't bother making official reports to the police any more because they're working for the trans rights activists. Said that the prosecutor is also "captured" by the trans rights activists. • Was repeatedly asked why he called the teenage SB a sociopath. He brings up that he heard she'd ordered pizzas to a GC person's house at 4am. [Note: this has been verified as Not True] • Said the teenager was a "domestic terrorist" because he believed she was in a group of activists who released crickets into an LBG alliance event [also Not True], and this is terrorism because women famously don't like insects. • Said that he has transgender friends and they all hate trans rights activists too. Said that "trans rights activists hate women, and I hate them". • Throughout day one of the trial his supporters in the public gallery frequently laughed in agreement and had to be told to be quiet. They were warned on the second day that this wasn't appropriate behaviour and would be removed if it happened again. The trial ran out of time and a third date has now been scheduled for the end of October.
The frog-faced Fascist was defending him on BBC this morning - actually using him as the example to prove his claim that the UK is attacking free speech. And of course, Kuntsberg let him spout without comeback
Starmer and Bad Enoch rushed to defend him last week Really good look for the Keir Leader, being on the same page as sentient Munsmnet and Peter Thiel's UK franchise...
Who could have guessed the grifting prick was projecting so hard that his projection was actually in Clacton? please log in to view this image
And yet the only voice challenging the frog-faced Fascist is the new Green Party leader Zac Polanski. Not Starmer or Labour, not even the LibDums...
Can't say I have often agreed with Terry, but I'll make an exception... I'm just surprised that the questions being asked don't include 'Why the living **** would your French girlfriend WANT to buy a house in Clacton?'
