Or you could argue that over 3 years sentence for hurty words is excessive, and a for first time offence is a biased sentence from a Starmer right hand man, and seeing as the Labour guy was let off after making slit throat actions with his finger simulating death would deserve a much harsher sentence. But we all know those Labour specs see no evil if it's done by their party
The tories oversaw a clusterfck and left the this country in a mess despite record taxation and record borrowing. The Tory boys need to own it. Labour doing a good job sorting the mess they inherited out. SAFC top of the league FTMs and FTTs
You've failed (again) to address a single point of fact. It's all conspiracy theory bollocks without a single verifiable source. Probably time for you to obfuscate now, I'm just waiting for my first pint in the town to celebrate a cracking opening day.
please log in to view this image @Telegraph Three prisoners have been recalled to jail for every four freed this year following Labour’s launch of its early release scheme Maybe if they didn’t release violent criminals in the first place this wouldn’t happen but they don’t seem to want to deport the approx 12,000 foreign criminals that are in jail EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH
"THE AGE VERIFICATION SCAM Some companies claim they are protecting you. But they are really harvesting you. Age verification has become the perfect disguise. It sounds like safety. It feels like protection. But behind the curtain, it is a data grab. → Date of birth → Legal name → Government-issued ID → Sometimes even facial scans Once collected, that information lives forever in their systems. And "forever" is a dangerous word in the world of data. Your birthday can unlock your identity in the wrong hands. Your photo can train an AI without your permission. Your ID can be sold, shared, or stolen. The companies doing this rarely give you the full picture. They do not clearly explain how long they keep your data. They do not disclose who they share it with. They hide behind a legal checkbox and call it compliance. Meanwhile, the real compliance — protecting consumer privacy — gets ignored. Safety and privacy are not the same thing. You can verify age without storing personal data. You can protect people without building a permanent file on them. If companies cared about privacy, they would prove it in their design, not in their press releases. Consumers are waking up. Trust will be the currency that matters. And those who abuse it will pay the price."
The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion The US State Department has accused the UK of having "significant human rights issues", including restrictions on free speech. please log in to view this image
Begging me for help No, you confirmed the point in my initial post, which caused you to flap and flounder. All you proved is your ignorance and desperation, as well as the fact you've become as boring as ****.
