I added this a few windows back: I'll remove it. If all goes well, I'm very sorry for any heartache that I may have caused.
Why does he have to be careful? They're not going to assassinate him for believing your conspiracy theory
Our owners who have more wealth than the 19 owners combined can’t spend because of PSR as we can’t offer the same levels of wages. It’s sickening.
Conspiracy theory. It being played out in front of you. Name another premier league owner who actively funds other premier league teams to the detriment of what it owns. There isn't one. Careful because once you join the dots, you cant go back and unsee it
The things I said are true not a conspiracy. Well the Isak part is me making that up but it’s plausible. Actually I was also wrong about the Nunez fee. It’s actually £65m. Urgh. This window is quite depressing. I guess the cartel do indeed have us over a barrel.
If you think about it really, really hard and get those blood vessels flexing, I reckon you'll figure out why our owner is slightly different than the owners of Crystal Palace and Everton
I know but then can you answer this for me. Chelsea commercials are so far ahead of NUFC but we are told to increase revenues to close the gap. Now in the past 8 weeks PIF have directly funded Chelsea coffer with an extra £120M for winning the CWC and buying Felix. So we are now to increase our revenues by a minimum of £120m to even start making a dent on the gap. There is also rumour that PIF or Saudis are in discussion about Chelsea shirt sponsor. So Ive flexed my blood vessels, can you do the courtesy of flexing yours and answering how what PIF are doing above, is all part of some plan to make NUFC no1?
You asked how many clubs won trophies after psr. I asked how many had won prior to psr sounds like the answers were the same, so clearly it’s not just PSR that is stopping clubs from winning things. What stopped clubs winning beforehand if it wasn’t psr? - genuine question as you seem to be suggesting that psr is stoping clubs from winning trophies now. there will always be clubs who are more of an attraction be it for historical reasons or location or finances being offered. But there will always be teams who win things like palace, like Leicester.
I guess the Pl blocked our ability to conclude deals with the PIF companies. We have increased commercial deals but not to the extent I was expecting. And that’s because the Cartel blocked that avenue. I think I’m at the point now where I don’t think we can bridge the gap.
That question alone proves that despite flexing those vessels you didn't understand my point. My point answers that question for you
You have to agree PSR and Related party new rules implemented when our takeover went ahead is holding us back mate surely. We have the richest owners in the world who can’t spend and compete with the cartel six because we can’t offer the same wages. Only half. We can’t grow our commercial deals fast enough to keep up with the big six because they all get reviewed by the PL. Every player we have lost out to this window has been to a big six club who can’t spend double the wages that we can pay under the current rules. As such it’s these rules that are holding us back becoming as big as the cartel 6.
And it’s not just us that It’s affecting. Aston Villa, Forrest who have owners who want to invest can’t because they can’t grow the revenue streams fast enough to get to the same levels as the cartel six. Can’t attract the players because they can’t pay the wages because of the rules. Which stints commercial growth and progress. It’s a vicious circle. Meanwhile manu who have been **** for the last 5 years can spend 200m on players while making staff redundancies. It’s ****ing diabolical.
