Didn't watch match and only seen highlights but I couldn't see our players as they blended with the grass
13 days and two friendlies before we kick off vs Villa with this: GK: Pope-less/Relegation Ramsdale (plus four others) RB: Tino/Trippier* RCB: Schar*/Lascelles** LCB: Botman/Burn* LB: Hall/Targett** CDM: Tonali/nobody RCM: BrunoG/Miley LCM: Joelinton/Willock**(aka nobody) RW: Elanga/Murphy/Osula CF: Nobody LW: Gordon/Barnes Notable subs: None. There's a bloke called Krafth, 4 'keepers as mentioned and some kids who never play. And Harrison Ashby. * denotes OAP ** denotes ****ing useless
Makes you wonder what he did actually do then when he was here. Absolute failure by the look of it. Pleased, in that case, that’s he’s gone.
I wouldn't go that far because the won a cup and made the champions league. Without the PIF we'd have got relegated with or without Howe.
I’d suggest you go read martial n Samuel’s take on him in the times then Go and delete every post you’ve stuck up for this ****ing bellend and hope we forget
No chance in reading an Ashley fans take.. Samual loved Mike Ashley mate. Even if Mitchell is an arsehole which I don't think he is, he still knows what recruitment should look like.
He knew what it looked like. Botman, Burn, Bruno, Trippier, Gordon, Barnes, Isak. Unfortunately he didn’t follow suit.
Landed us in psr trouble so we couldn't do anything until this summer and so far we're struggling still.
Think we've done this but it ain't all about the short term or the players abilities. It's the longer term vision and scouting network requirements needed to avoid certain issues down the road. When we ran into psr trouble people said Howe wasn't backed.
Actually I never complained about the situation because I knew the money was front loaded, but now I'm pretty sure there's issues with recruitment. I can listen to Mitchell given his occupational experience without liking or dislike coming into it.
You fail to question the reason for his comments being made public as opposed to internally and, therefore, the veracity of his comments. You are naively or deliberately accepting them at face value.