nope I was talking about the SECOUND foul on Walter's too? What you saying about that? Funny how Walters had beaten Kaboul for pace, he went down are you saying Walter's dived? The first one is obvious his hands went to his face
Without doubt ADM, and as long as I've got a brain to think with and a love of football, I'll be wishing relegation on them. They're not a big club, haven't been a big club for 50 years and probably never have been this century or last. With any luck, sooner or later their star will fall.
Yeah, that's what we're moaning about. Not the extremely soft second yellow. Not the ton of other decisions that went against us. We're moaning about the yellow for dissent.
Was that at me? I haven't complained about the sending off, I felt it was a little harsh but I could see where he's coming from, although Kaboul was right to be upset at being denied a stonewall pen. That pen decision aswell as the handball and the "offside" riled me most.
Well Kaboul isn't the REF when he learns that fact maybe he won't be getting too may 2nd yellows will he.. he was booked therefore the foul on Walters was a 2nd yellow that, was the point I was making... IDIOTS the lot.
That's not even a point. He was booked for dissent and that's fine. The second yellow was crap, though. It's a foul, but nowhere near another yellow. Why the hell are Stoke fans defending such a ****e refereeing performance? Foy was clearly awful. What do you have to gain by denying it?
We didn't defend the decision to send Cahill off last week though, Ensil. Nobody's going to come along and say, "Hey, even the Stoke fans think that Foy was ****. Give the points to Spurs!", are they?
Well at least Pulis seems to hint that they got lucky with a load of the decisions: 'It’s fallen our side today from what everybody tells us, and I’m delighted about that.' (From The Mail article quoted above). Fair enough. Any Stoke fan who doesn't acknowledge the same is kidding themselves.
To be fair fella I was swearing from the first minute until the 90th. I saw the interview and he didn't swear, although he had just cause to let fly a string of $#&^*@? s.
Why has this thread not been closed? and why has this wum not been barred from our board? Just asking.
