Now you are being 'anti-semitic' ... rather than just calling out acts that need investigating as potential war crimes ...
... and shouldn't ... as I'm sure we can all agree ... and 40,000 women and kids in a total of 55,000 dead Gazans ain't 'collateral' ... or 'defensive'...
Well some of these people queuing for food have been known to suddenly explode so I guess it’s a good idea not to get too close and to get back when the IDF says so.
What about the concert at the start of this though? Innocent people slaughterd in the name of Palestine. Not that I'm condoning the reaction.
It’s always going to happen in every conflict. It’s unavoidable especially when the enemy have embedded themselves in with the civilians.
How is that anti semitic? Like I said the other day, the occupation forces should be nowhere near aid or aid drops
I'm being ironic buddy ... the accusation of 'anti-semitism' is a label often applied by the most blinkered supporters of this morally corrupt Israeli regime ... it helps them ignore the numbers of dead innocents in Gaza and turn a blind eye to the most obvious ethnic cleansing since Hitler and the Nazis ...
Both sides have committed crimes against innocent people, how do you pick a side? To me that's done by siding with the innocent that have nothing to do with any of those parties and condemning both governments and the agencies they both employ to slaughter innocent people.
My heart goes out to the 1,200 who lost their lives, just as it does to the over 40,000 women and kids killed in the name of a defensive action ...
You don't need to pick a side - just wholly condemn the slaughter of innocents - whoever is doing it... ... which is what most on here are doing ... but be appalled by / criticise the annihilation of 40,000 women and kids and you'll get labelled 'anti-semitic' ... presumably Arab lives don't count as much as others...
So why side with a country that clearly does not care that it happened or at least are unwilling to acknowledge and condem the actions of that group representing their country? It's a mess and I think the UK social media pick a side nonsense is ridiculous.
I think that on here the slaughter of innocence is only condemned if it suits your argument and ignored if it doesn't. Just what I'm seeing.
Not the Khmer Rouge or the Jews forced out of various Muslim-majority countries after WWII or Burma or the Balkans or the Kurds or any of the other dozens of ethnic cleansings. This is the most obvious in 80 years and we’re meant to believe people haven’t been driven absolutely mental by their ****ing over Palestine.
Who is siding? ... yes I want to see the UN address Israeli illegal occupation and settlements in the West Bank (under International Law - not my laws) and legitimise a Palestinian homeland ... but that's no different to me wanting a secure and respected Israeli homeland ... that's more a sense of 'what's equitable' than siding with anyone ...