Possibly because Iran are (allegedly) behind the arming of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houtis and every other militia / sect opposed to Israel ... but no doubt you know best dear ... perhaps they all get armed by 'crowd funding' ?
A system designed to protect civilians. But it's good to know you think civilians are legitimate targets.
Anti-missile systems are legitimate military targets no matter where they are placed. Maybe Israel shouldn’t use the people of Tel Aviv as human shields. Also lol at your faux outrage about civilians dying whilst defending Israel.
I've binned him. He closed his account not that long ago hence why it's reasonably new. No sooner had I deleted his account for him on request, he immediately came back with another version 2 lol - hence why I recognised the account. As for sock, could be, I've an inkling who, which also ticks another box for me with him turning up here like this.
At the risk of upsetting a few on here the ONLY WAY to stop Iran being a worldwide threat is to totally take out the entire ruling ideologists who have turned the koran into a blueprint for war not peace
Not upsetting me - I'm totally opposed to extremists... whether they cling to the Quran... or the Star of David ... or the star bangled banner ...
We should have stood up to Iran a long time ago, and I don't just mean Israel doing it. I hate war and I hate any civilians being harmed, whether they be Israeli, Iranian or Palestinian, but I get people will twist conversation to suit their own mindset. Iran have been the major cause of the problem in this and they would also do anything to undermine the United Kingdom, recent capture of agents proving that. If they wish the UK or Israel harm, then we must eliminate their capability to do so with tageted responses, that do not include civilians (nuclear scientists are fair game). As soon as America gets involved the Iranians will start targeting the US bases, of which there are loads in the Middle East. Time to wake up and sort these ****s out.
I have no problem in stopping Iran building neuclear weapons (even though international inspection teams have found no evidence of this) but Isreal have no right to be involved since they have had Neuclear capabilty for decades. Why is it ok for one war mongering country but not another?
Iran have been behind most the problems in the region, therefore would I trust them over nuclear capability, not one bit. I know it proves nothing, but six scientists would have been taken out for a very good reason. Even if they have not got them now, future capability is a threat, long after you and I have gone, it will be harder to deal with once at that stage, so let's stop ****ing about and all do ourselves and the future a favour NOW - by making that message loud and clear. They've had their chances to come to the table and sort it out and they've been reminded again by Macron and Starmer, either seek a solution now, or expect consequences because in my mind we really can't take the risk, look at all it's proxies, it's been a puppeteer for far too long and time to cuts it strings.
As for the rest of the comments Diego, you and I will not agree, so I'll leave it. I have no issue with you bro, only outsiders that suddenly want to drop in to have a pop. I purposely keep off other club board politic threads.
So Iran would be some sort of threat with neuclear capabilitry but Isreal aren't. Which country has just literally flattend Gaza and obliterated tens of thousands of it's population?
No I don't see Israels nuclear capability as a threat is my straight answer to that. If I did I would say so, you should know me well enough by now - or another way to put it, I see it no more of a threat than any other capability in the world. My one major concern with Iran is their outlook on martyrdom, America had to deal with Japan on that score with a Fat Man and a Little Boy, I would prefer we sorted the problem with Iran a bit more civilised than August 1945.
