Now imagine it was something important to people, like their faith, that countless people have died for.
Every muslim country was stolen by murdering the previous indigenous inhabitants. They have zero claim to any lands , the daft bastards even think Spain is muslamic
Was sort of thick twat thinks announcing they are atheists would protect them from blasphemy laws and religious extremists that kill non-believers?
England was, like Michael Stipe, losing its religion. That was good. Importing a new one is not good.
I've toured the Middle East a few times and have always been treated beautifully. The hospitality in Lebanon is outstanding. The people often say we are mad for allowing so much dross to settle here. And they mean fellow Muslims.
in 2001, Keir Starmer defended a woman who burned the US flag —arguing she should be protected under free speech laws. Ah, but, let's show our understanding and maturity and get giddy about a typo or try some other feeble whataboutary..... https://x.com/GBNEWS/status/1929545796543824127
What could possibly go wrong? RESPECT ORDERS - You don’t need to break the law to be criminalised in Britain. You just need to annoy the wrong person. The government is pushing through something called a Respect Order, part of the new Crime and Policing Bill now moving through Parliament. Respect Orders are civil, not criminal, so they don’t require a jury or criminal standard of proof. Just someone saying you’re causing a nuisance, even online! If someone complains, that you're too loud, too disruptive, too opinionated, you can be banned from: ▪️Posting on social media ▪️Attending a protest ▪️Speaking in a public place ▪️Even entering certain areas All without ever being charged with a crime. And if you break the order? well … that’s a crime. You could be fined, arrested, or jailed for up to two years. It’s pre-crime policing and It’s about control, not safety. It’s a ban on dissent. https://x.com/tesla_jokes/status/1929547455617483036
You're as irrelevant and misleading as usual I see dopey, as yet again you've fallen for the headline, without looking at the detail. Are you saying they shouldn't look for waste in public services, especially as they don't get paid to do it.
