Of course. The PNAC group was a Neo-con think tank, the document they produced outlined their plans and policies to ensure that America was to remain as the golbal superpower in the coming century, they had 10 members in the Bush administration pre 9/11, including Wolfowitz, Cheney and Rumsfeld, not to mention Bush snr. They called for as much as 100 Billion spending increase on military, for regime change in the middle east, in particular states like Iraq, to enable America to launch preemptive strikes, to push for control of natural resources, to deny others the use of outer space. They acknowledged that, in their own words, "the process of transformation, even if it brings revoloutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" One year later they get their Pearl Harbour, and low and behold, achieve 90% of what they outlined in PNAC. I am not saying every person involved with PNAC is guilty, but there was 4 or 5 of them who had the positions of power within the Bush Administration, who benefited greatly from 9/11, that would make them suspects and worthy of investigation at the very least. No such investigation was carried out on any member of PNAC. This is just one of the many aspects of coincidental benefits to fall into the lap of the "attacked" on 9/11, then you have the money made from insider trading, the Insurance job, the news that 2.3 trillion could not be accounted for completely overshadowed and forgotten, the evidence of the enron scandal dissappearing, the Patriot Act, which was already written up btw, I would be here all night going through everything but id probably be wasting my time. There is clearly no shortage of motive or means, and only a fool would write it off as coincidence without a proper trial. The most important issue is showing that the official theory is false, its lies, told by master liars, the accused had nothing to gain, a number of them were still alive, the supposed main man was never officially wanted in connection with the attack, they did not have the means, on their own anyway. Which is why I believe with 100% certainty that at the very least, there was high level complicity and knowledge of the events that day.
Bin Laden said it would have been impossible for him to organise such a complex and sophisticated operation. "I have already stated that I have no involvement in the events of September 11 and the attacks on the United States. I had no knowledge of these acts, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women and children and other humans an appreciable act. There exists a government within the government of the United States. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out these attacks. The US should trace the perpetrators of those attacks to these persons who want to make the present century one of their own control, who want to enslave other countries." The Taliban offered to hand Bin Laden over if America could provide evidence of his responsibility for the attacks, which obviously, they couldnt. Three weeks later Afganistan was invaded. Bin Laden was never meant to be caught, they needed to get into Afganistan as it was the only place to run the pipelines from the Caspian Sea to control the flow of Gas to Russia and China. Shortly before 9/11 the Taliban were given one last chance to allow construction of the pipeline which they declined. After taking control, the US installed Hamid Karzai, a former consultant to UNOCAL(Union Oil Californa), and the first thing he done was sign the deal for the pipelines to be built. The global War On Terror is a media farce, its a total farse, you have young soldiers still to this day, running about minefields risking their lives for a complete falsehood and its not on. People need to start realizing what has really been going over the last 10 years and demand that our armed forces are removed from Iraq and Afganistan. That is the first step.
Couldn't it be argued that he was trying to garner public supporter and more crowds by claiming that he had no involvement so it just makes the Invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq even more pointless? i reckon a lot of people would sign up if they believed them and decided to join the taliban to fight foreign forces who just happen to be invading their country?
I just worked 9 straight shifts at the new casino, it`s ****ing massive and now i am a full time inspector so i just have to watch games and track money and chips..... Love it, <yes i did suck some cock >
Afganistan dosent need anyone to make them fight invading forces, in the history of the world, no one has ever took Afganistan, Alexander the Great couldnt take it, the Russians couldnt take it, the Afgans will fight American and British troops until the end of time, nothing to do with Bin Laden, he was not even from Afganistan. He was a hero in the country yes for his efforts against the Russians, but he was not even involved in this fight when America invaded. He was long gone. Terrorists claim responsibilty for attacks, its kinda what they are all about.
[video=youtube;uYZy9eRazVw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uYZy9eRazVw[/video] Hash posted this H M mafia, catchy to ****
[video=youtube;blLUp_1KSh8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blLUp_1KSh8&feature=related[/video] please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image
Ah so now we have it. "Regime Change" in Iraq was one of the reasons for 9/11. Whoever planned 9/11 did so to give the USA a reason to invade Iraq and Afghanistan? This "fake" act of terrorism would finally give the US the excuse it was looking for to invade foreign soil. Hmm, I think I see several major flaws in that theory so I will lay this out in easy to comprehend sections. Here are some of the facts you know eddie (feel free to correct me if i'm in error) 1: Some people (Let's call them PNAC for simplicity's sake) thought that by organising a terrorist attack (the largest in history) that a cry would ring around the world for the perpetrators to be brought to justice and that this would naturally lead to an invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan (where Bin Laden was alegedly hiding). 2: We are to believe that the 19 highjackers were mere patsies in this grand scheme and in fact some of them are still alive and have actually come forward to deny being involved. 3: Al qaeda don't exist, they are a fabrication and Osama Bin Laden is head of nothing. 1: If PNAC or anyone else wanted a reason to invade Iraq or Afghanistan there are far simpler ways to achieve that aim. WMDs for one. They found none in Iraq I think we all know. Do you not think that it would have been easy to "Plant" WMDs in Iraq after the invasion so that the Yanks could simply have said "here are the WMDs we told you Saddam had, that proves we were right to invade"? They could have repeated this ploy in Afghanistan (or anywhere else for that matter) by claiming OBL had a dirty bomb. 2: These 19 "Patsies", how many of them were Iraqis or Afghans? None. In fact 15 of them were Saudis. Does that not seem a bit strange? If PNAC picked these people as fall guys, why did they not have 15 Iraqis, in fact why not 15 Iraqis who were secretly working for Saddam's secret service? None of them survived in reality, the myth that some of them are alive is a lie perpetrated by "truthers". Feel free to show me any video interviews with any of the 9/11 highjackers after the attacks, (I have already shown you martyrdom videos for several of these innocents). 3: If al qaeda don't exist why have you published a denial by OBL? If he is head of nothing why should his denials carry any weight? Anyway I have already posted a video where his No 2 openly admits that AL Qaeda planned and carried out the attacks and OBL is sitting beside him while he says it.
The new U.S. $20 dollar bill contains hidden pictures of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks! Yes! see for yourself... 1st) FOLD A NEW $20 BILL THIS WAY: please log in to view this image 2nd) CONTINUE TO FOLD THIS WAY Compare your fold precisely to this picture. please log in to view this image please log in to view this image 3rd) FOLD THE RIGHT SIDE UNDER, exactly as you folded the left side. You'll immediately see the Pentagon ablaze! (red circle) please log in to view this image please log in to view this image 4th) NOW FLIP IT OVER AND SEE OTHER SIDE The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center are hit and smoking please log in to view this image please log in to view this image What are the odds that a simple geometric folding of the $20 bill would accidentally contain a representation of both terror attacks? And finally: please log in to view this image
1. Are you honestly that naive? The wars would never have been supported without the attack on 9/11, why plant bombs in individual countries when one huge attack in America would allow you to wage preemptive war all over the world, at the same time killing another 10 birds with the same stone. 2. Why Iraqis? The nationality of the "hijackers" was irrelevant, Islam was the order of the day. The BBC actually reported accused hijackers as being alive Russ, you are the one lying by saying it was a lie made by "truthers". http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/1559151.stm 3. Al Qaeda does not exist as an organisation, it never has, and it never will. I have posted a quote from Bin Laden because he was blamed for the attacks with no evidence, how is that not relevant? It proves that the CIA faked taped confessions. Please show me this video, and show me the proof that Al Qaeda is an organisation with a hierarchy. It is abundantly clear that I am getting the upperhand of you now Dev, and your lack of knowledge on the subject is showing through. I have about 5 years worth in hand of you, and I dont really see what you are trying to achieve. I think one of your problems is that you fail to see the big picture.
