So you are just going to avoid giving me an answer in case you hang yourself out to dry with a point that I can destroy easily? Don't be a blouse eddie, commit yourself for once if you are so positive about 9/11, you won't though because you are scared of the obvious consequences of actually saying anything.
Ive told you a million times the possible whys, you cant explain 9/11 in one sentance, have a look at PNAC and you will have your own idea of why they may have done it. IMO, its too much of a beneficial coincidence, far too much.
He has posted about 200 hrs of stuff Dev, WTC7 Fell over without anything hitting it and housed the HQ for the IRS, CIA and FBI..... Larry Silverstein was making a loss on renting office space at WTC , he was told he needed to remove the asbestos from these buildings at a gigantic cost <about $200m>,and refused permission to demolish them... He takes the Worlds first insurance policy covering him for terrorist attacks from planes. 6 months later 2 planes hit 2 of the 3 buildings and all 3 collapse into themselves..
So who was behind it? You surely must know after all your exhaustive research on YouTube? You seem to be covering your bases and i'm afraid if you cannot actually say who was behind it then the question has to be asked, what point are you actually trying to make when you post these videos purporting to show iron clad evidence against someone? Who do YOU think organised it?
The goal of regime change in Iraq remained the consistent position of PNAC throughout the 1997-2000 So that's what you were driving at eddie? PNAC - who you have mentioned - wanted regime change in Iraq? Was that "In your opinion" one of the many reasons why 9/11 was organised by agents/Agencies/persons unknown? A simple yes or no because this is a very simple question. Was regime change in Iraq one of the reasons that a false flag attack was planned against the US? Over to you
@Dev Why are you wasting your time? I like eddie but he's a ****ing lunatic.Stop arguing with him.You can't win INHISHUMBLEOPINION.
I'm trying to give him enough rope to hang himself Irish, then hopefully we'll hear no more of this nonsense on here. Hopefully he'll answer my simple question and his theory will crumble like so much dust. eddie seems to have a million bits of "evidence" which shows why 9/11 was a sham attack but he seems a bit confused as to who actually planned it and to what ends, I must say that strikes me as a bit odd, he has all the info on how it was done but he does not know why it was done or who did it??????
If I knew exactly who was behind it, I wouldnt be on here talking to you would I? Who I think organised it is irrelevant, that is for the courts to find out when a proper investigation is carried out and all suspects are thoroughly investigated. The main point of my focus on the subject, and the vast majority of people's for that matter, is showing how the official story is lies, and how a real investigation is needed. I dont have the power. I doubt that it will happen because "a lot of people lie, and get away with it".
Eddie i think your more in with a chance of getting 1 million replies on this thread than that **** uncut one. Not that this is not **** or that.
