Off Topic Lord Mayor

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The winner will be?

  • Luke Campbell

  • Mike Ross

  • Rowan Halstead

  • Anne Handley

  • Kerry Harrison

  • Margaret Pinder


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
£13m a year for 30 years

Peanuts

The bigger prize is if the Mayor can unlock/encourage additional funding from Govt, like the potential £15Bn in net zero investment

Thanks. £13 million a year is peanuts in terms of budgets even for local government but there are still positive things you can do for the area with it. Unfortunately, I think a fair chunk of it will go on administrative costs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew
Thanks. £13 million a year is peanuts in terms of budgets even for local government but there are still positive things you can do for the area with it. Unfortunately, I think a fair chunk of it will go on administrative costs.
Correct
He’ll have to pay his staff and office costs out of that.
 
Thanks. £13 million a year is peanuts in terms of budgets even for local government but there are still positive things you can do for the area with it. Unfortunately, I think a fair chunk of it will go on administrative costs.
This is where the big money is…as long as he supports it against the national Reform policy…
You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
Politicians,Politics,an endless argument never resolved...

None of them give two hoots nowadays,a bunch of freeloading hypocrites telling us what we want to hear whilst taking a big fat wedge and freebies aplenty.None of the lying bastards know what it's like to live on the edge of the abyss,having to carefully select what goes in their supermarket trolley and what 'luxury' item stays on the shelf this week because it's doubled in price in the last 6 months.None of them need to make the choice between putting the heating on or paying a bill...A nest of vipers wrapping themselves around us to suffocate us!!!
 
Am I right in thinking the new mayoralty for Hull and East Riding has quite a bit of money to spend locally? Heard conflicting things about it being around £2 million or a lot more than that.
The new authority that Campbell will lead has a budget of £13m every year for the next thirty years. And several government grants that previously went direct to East Riding and Hull councils will be routed via the Mayor and Combined Authority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
Politicians,Politics,an endless argument never resolved...

None of them give two hoots nowadays,a bunch of freeloading hypocrites telling us what we want to hear whilst taking a big fat wedge and freebies aplenty.None of the lying bastards know what it's like to live on the edge of the abyss,having to carefully select what goes in their supermarket trolley and what 'luxury' item stays on the shelf this week because it's doubled in price in the last 6 months.None of them need to make the choice between putting the heating on or paying a bill...A nest of vipers wrapping themselves around us to suffocate us!!!

The amazing thing is some people think Reform are somehow different
 
The new authority that Campbell will lead has a budget of £13m every year for the next thirty years. And several government grants that previously went direct to East Riding and Hull councils will be routed via the Mayor and Combined Authority.
Actually that’s a fair point which I missed.
Anne Handley covered the other grants at one of the hustings.
Some of them are re routed (so aren’t new money…it’s just Luke can decide how they are spent rather than the Council) but I believe some only came because there was going to be a Mayor and were on top of that.
£13m a year for 30 years guaranteed but in first year at least I seem to recall her saying it was something like £60m
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlRawdah
To be fair they definitely have policies.
One of which will set this area back hugely and cause significant job losses or at least stop significant job increases in the area.
That’s their opposition to NetZero.
I’m not actually a supporter of it myself particularly, but selfishly if the current Govt are giving cash to achieve it then as the area that creates the biggest amount of carbon in the UK they’ll get the biggest bang for their buck by pouring the Billions of pounds that Reform rightly highlight into jobs and investment in our area…and so I hope they do.

That’s the area that Luke needs to do what he said he will do and not follow the national party line.

The current government proposals for net zero may bring some money to this region, but the actual measures will not achieve their stated goals, and work out very expensive in the longer term.
 
The current government proposals for net zero may bring some money to this region, but the actual measures will not achieve their stated goals, and work out very expensive in the longer term.
If I’m honest I don’t know much about it, but I suspect you’re right.
I’m only saying that selfishly I’d rather we got the money than Teeside
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk
Actually that’s a fair point which I missed.
Anne Handley covered the other grants at one of the hustings.
Some of them are re routed (so aren’t new money…it’s just Luke can decide how they are spent rather than the Council) but I believe some only came because there was going to be a Mayor and were on top of that.
£13m a year for 30 years guaranteed but in first year at least I seem to recall her saying it was something like £60m
For context, the neighbouring combined authority is handling around £170m this year. Some of it new money, much of it recurring annual awards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
If I’m honest I don’t know much about it, but I suspect you’re right.
I’m only saying that selfishly I’d rather we got the money than Teeside

It is something I know more than a bit about. Someone's getting what is actually our money back, so it may as well be us, but it really is a poor use of our money. There are far better investments that could be made with it and that will have a better impact on the environment and energy security.
 
For context, the neighbouring combined authority is handling around £170m this year. Some of it new money, much of it recurring annual awards.
Which is exactly why we should have had a Mayor years ago.
The money we should have had went to Teeside instead

(*I still think it should have been a Humber wide Mayor mind you but that’s a different, and defeated, debate)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Help! and Drew
Which is exactly why we should have had a Mayor years ago.
The money we should have had went to Teeside instead

(*I still think it should have been a Humber wide Mayor mind you but that’s a different, and defeated, debate)
That’s not the neighbouring authority I’m referring to, but your point stands!
 
To be fair they definitely have policies.
One of which will set this area back hugely and cause significant job losses or at least stop significant job increases in the area.
That’s their opposition to NetZero.
I’m not actually a supporter of it myself particularly, but selfishly if the current Govt are giving cash to achieve it then as the area that creates the biggest amount of carbon in the UK they’ll get the biggest bang for their buck by pouring the Billions of pounds that Reform rightly highlight into jobs and investment in our area…and so I hope they do.
That’s the area that Luke needs to do what he said he will do and not follow the national party line.

Just to note, yes, they oppose NetZero. Surely most now agree that the NetZero drive in it's current form is madness. It's likely Labour themselves will soon change direction. However, Reform, like nearly everyone else, still support sensible moves toward new technology to provide 'cleaner' energy and protecting the environment. All in their policies :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Politicians,Politics,an endless argument never resolved...

None of them give two hoots nowadays,a bunch of freeloading hypocrites telling us what we want to hear whilst taking a big fat wedge and freebies aplenty.None of the lying bastards know what it's like to live on the edge of the abyss,having to carefully select what goes in their supermarket trolley and what 'luxury' item stays on the shelf this week because it's doubled in price in the last 6 months.None of them need to make the choice between putting the heating on or paying a bill...A nest of vipers wrapping themselves around us to suffocate us!!!

Some of them do have experience of that. Some of which are in our current government. It's not true that all politicians are Etonian rich boys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Help! and Drew
Just to note, yes, they oppose NetZero. Surely most now agree that the NetZero drive in it's current form is madness. It's likely Labour themselves will soon change direction. However, Reform, like nearly everyone else, still support sensible moves toward new technology to provide 'cleaner' energy and protecting the environment. All in their policies :emoticon-0105-wink:
Surely Reform have made the biggest change in policy by no longer 'championing' Brexit?
 
Just to note, yes, they oppose NetZero. Surely most now agree that the NetZero drive in it's current form is madness. It's likely Labour themselves will soon change direction. However, Reform, like nearly everyone else, still support sensible moves toward new technology to provide 'cleaner' energy and protecting the environment. All in their policies :emoticon-0105-wink:
I’m not passing judgement on the policy, I’m merely saying that as it stands today there are £15Bn of investment up for grabs and it is Luke’s job to make sure it happens here rather than somewhere else.
If it stops that’s fine, but as Dutch said if it’s happening we may as well try and get it invested here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk
Status
Not open for further replies.