I take it you're saying Sky could have moved coverage of the Liverpool game to avoid clashing with the semifinal? Sky wouldn't have known that the Liverpool game was a title decider when they did their schedules and I don't know if it's possible or practical to re-schedule at short notice. If the clash had been with a dead rubber of a game I'd bet nobody would be in the least bit bothered. I know somebody who works on the sound team for a company which is occasionally contracted by the likes of Sky to cover games. Her schedule is set weeks in advance and she reckons it'd be a nightmare to rejig at short notice.
So Liverpool win the title, at a canter, but this season reminds me of Leicester’s win, it’s not that they were too good, it’s just the rest were so ****. Liverpool could have lost all of their last 5 games & still won the title because Arsenal won’t win all their last 5! On a final note, just watching SSN & seen they didn’t have the actual trophy there for them to lift & they had to make do with a cardboard cup. Whilst it’s quite funny, I think it was obvious Liverpool were winning the title & they should have had the actual trophy there!
Or to put it another way. Why is it so difficult to differentiate between the ego and the social environment?
The only way that doesn't happen, is if the the Premier League schedule no games, or Sky also get the FA Cup games.
Yes. Dozens going off at Liverpool with no problem. One at Hull causes asthmatic attacks, people hospitalised, a danger of a conflagration devouring the stadium,,,Warnings about points deductions and ground closures. And the police, who can’t identify bottle throwers at rugby games, studying the same CCTV to identify the person responsible and get a banning order.
