I was about to say he'll go to the usual fall back of you being 'rattled'. It's what they do when they're floundering, and as if by magic, he posted that before I got the chance. #aspredictableasfuck
Oh the you are angry same tired **** , yes that's another tried & failed tactic from the idiots without opinions as well as laugh emojis to show how amusing you are . A. What would you consider to be Labour’s greatest successes so far ? B. If diversity really is our greatest strength, what have the Pakistani, Somalian & Roma gypsy community brought to the country that has improved the lives of their hosts . Curry has already been used BTW .
If not having hysterical breakdowns every day, like you and the other idiot, makes you think I and others don’t have opinions, then that works for me.
Me What have Roma gypsies done to improve Britain ? Lefty ****wit Rattled to **** lol Me So you have nothing ? Lefty ****wit No wonder you got chased from the PL boards Me Did you vote Labour Lefty ****wits Rattled to **** , no wonder you got chased from the PL boards Like some basic chatbot incapable of thinking for itself, instead just spits out generic responses without engaging in any actual conversation. There are at least 3 accounts that act in the exact same way , mindless far leftist drones
Again you’ve fallen into the trap of thinking that because I don’t spew daily hatred I must be far left You have a very disturbing one dimensional view of the world, which you use to mask your own inadequacies, so whatever I say isn’t going to change your mind. I’m sure you or the other idiot will come back with I’m frightened or unable to provide any credible argument, and I’m happy for you to think that…
They've failed with the same tactics for years, but keep coming back and trying and yet claiming they don't care what we think. I feel sorry for them. I forget about them within seconds of seeing their names, but they're stuck with themselves 24/7/365. That can't be nice.
I have had very different views & opinions to you on various topics over the years & we can handle the fact that we could be correct or incorrect posting information to back up our claims. This is called debate & we don't have to agree on everything, even changing our minds if evidence is provided proving to be incorrect. The far leftists refuse to back up their World view so resort to personal attacks or claims that the person is angry . I'm guessing to obfuscate from their spurious far leftist narrative & to derail the conversation. Strange bunch
And despite people being able to see what's posted and make up their own minds, they'll use this exchange in the future claiming it as a 'success' despite offering no meaningful opinions, and proving what is being said about them in the process. And they wonder why they're just not seen as meaningful.
I read that on Thursday, desperate for any current affairs relevance, Question Time had ‘Gary’ the wealth tax protestor on the panel. No doubt the Liberal Democrats agreed with him and the official Labour person towed the Party line to retain the whip. Apparently, Fiona Bruce is only on £400k at the BBC but she is wealthy and should pay more tax. Someone have a word with millionaire tax dodging Leftie Gary Lineker... In a week’s time nobody will remember the schmuck just like nobody bothers reporting on the Islamists and anti-Semites marching through Londanistan every weekend with lifetime loser Jeremiah Codpiece and loony Leftie Owen Jones up front.
They could have saved half that money if they had got a five year old to lend them their school atlas to book the flight plans. Instead they let Lammy sit in the cockpit pointing out which way to go to the pilot. That trip to Syria via their neighbours in Libya was unnecessary as there was no British national interest other than possibly telling them that we were going to send all the Syrian refugees back now that Assad has gone. Flying all over Africa to see how our overseas aid money was being used for buying weapons by corrupt regimes is hardly in the British national interest either unless you plan to stop the money.
On Friday, in Communist Corner on Tw*tter, some tw*t posted that Tesco makes £4bn profit and yet 50% of their staff are on Universal Credit so there should be a tax on the billions and they should be forced to pay higher wages. As usual, this type of argument does not stand up to much scrutiny. Firstly, Tesco made a £2.3bn profit on a business with sales of £68.2bn, so that is hardly extortionate (3.4%); and that profit has been subjected to all the taxes that impact any corporation. Tesco has been owned by shareholders for over 75 years so the only ‘billionaires’ that are likely to be involved are entities like pension funds. Secondly, it may well be true that 50% of Tesco employees are on Universal Credit; however, that is likely to be by choice. Many part-time Tesco employees only work up to 16 hours a week so that they can continue to claim benefits. If they worked more hours their income would breach a benefit threshold and their benefits would be stopped, including other benefits that they claim towards their housing and children. So the problem here is not one that has been created by Tesco but one that has been created by politicians. Tesco will not be making £4bn next year thanks to Rachel from Accounts so they will pay less corporation tax having paid more National Insurance; and price rises will lead to inflation. Politicians of all parties want to see more people working more hours and not claiming benefits (which are unsustainable going forward), yet they have created a welfare system that makes it more lucrative to stay at home watching daytime TV. Many of the people living in ‘poverty’ in this country are choosing to do so and taxing the wealthy will only result in most of the middle class being pushed into the same group. It is called Communism – make everyone equal at the bottom.
