British Politics spam thread

It’s abused , no doubt . It’s use probably need reviewed as some cases are absurd (ie kid likes chicken nuggets , family hates *****s etc)

But I’d we remained in it (and have it apply to us) than have our rights removed .

 

Bollocks.

 

"Evil Communists take away all your rights"

"Take away all my rights"

Same people

 

Tony Blair invented the HRA in 1998 just before opening the floodgates to bongo-bongoland.

Starmer, Sadiq , Blair's wife & all the other human rights lawyers use it to stop us deporting the human garbage dumped on us .

It's written to protect the aggressor over the victim & needs to be abolished .

If we can't deport *****philes murderers or terrorists because they have a human right to live here at our expense then it's clearly been weaponised against ourselves, we pick up the bill of course .

 

please log in to view this image

 

Always thought this is the way to go

 

If you offer a National health service for "free" to non Nationals it's always going to haemorrhage money .
If I travel to China or America i need to buy health insurance if I want to be treated or face an enormous medical bill if i need to use their health service, the same very obvious rules should apply here too for starters .

 

please log in to view this image

 

You don’t believe our government/s wouldn't run riot without a court of human rights in place?

You weren't paying attention 5 years ago

if we exit the ECHR, we need to have a viable alternative in place

You can simply say bollocks btw in response

 

You can't abolish without implementing a suitable replacement

As I said, it's being abused as is - needs reviewed but you can’t just abolish without an alternative that protects UK citizens

 

We were better off before it got implemented, lawyers just use it to give protections to the worst people in society.
This lot are even pushing a bill that makes it harder to lock up criminals from a protected characteristic ergo black brown muslim women trans etc & giving straight white British Christian men much harsher sentences .
Presumably to reduce the number of foreigners & muslims in our prisons rather than treating us equally.

Starmer bleeds ECHR laws as proven by his double standard approach to law & order

 

I don’t disagree with some of your points here but I'm not advocating for it's removal until I know we can ensure we, uk citizens are protected.

https://www.echr.coe.int/70-years-o...on for the Protection,came into force in 1953.

https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/n...The ECtHR was set up,(ECHR) and its protocols.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Court_of_Human_Rights#History_and_structure

It's not recent btw it's embedded in UK law (we designed it) - we can’t remove ourselves this legislation or process without protection.

 

They have no jurisdiction over us & our European neighbours don't bother following it when they want to deport their criminals .

 

Short term thinking - "remove us from this to control immigration"

Long term consequences - you end up with facism

https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/uk-human-rights-act

 

How is it that white working class English people weren't able to use the ECHR when Starmer was getting his politically charged goons booting doors in & locking up people for protesting about children getting stabbed by a muslim convert Rwandan ?

Starmer is a fascist

 

Get a better lawyer probbaly - i cant answer that but it's not in place just for 'wrong uns' / criminals or immigrants - I've added a link

 

Human Rights or Humans We Like Rights?

Just remember it's taken us thousands of years just to get the rights we have

 

Ironically people like Tommy Robertson may be able to use the ECHR to protest about his cruel & usual punishment case being locked in solitary confinement under this government's persecution of political prisoners.

I won't hold my breath though , the Southport mass child murderer is free to walk about amongst the other criminals & attend the prison mosque without fear of retribution.

 

We would of course have to write similar rights into our constitution if we left it. The win would be that once our legal system had made the decision, that would be the end of the matter. I'd add the clause: "Does not apply to anyone born outside the UK whose parents were born outside the UK". So Sir Cliff would be OK.