I was more interested in the man’s skin colour tbh mate. When I seen the guys name I thought we were being treated to whitey committing a criminal act
I thought it was a panel of 3, not 14! Fourteen senior clinicians from around the world have analysed the medical evidence against Letby, including British doctor Neena Modi, a former president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. The panel was assembled by Dr Shoo Lee, a retired Canadian doctor based at the University of Toronto who specialises in the treatment of young children. He said the panel worked without payment and were not familiar with the case prior to reviewing the evidence. On Tuesday, Dr Lee said the panel believed all of Letby's victims actually died of natural causes or because of poor medical care. "There was no medical evidence to support malfeasance causing death or injury," he told a news conference, before listing what he alleged were a number of wider failings at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit where Letby worked. The report deals with the cases of all 14 babies in turn. In one case in which Letby was convicted of killing a baby by injecting air into its stomach, the panel said their analysis indicated a cause of death arising from natural respiratory complications and chronic lung disease. Additionally, they said doctors had failed to detect a bacterial illness and should have prescribed antibiotics. In a case where Letby was convicted of attacking a baby by removing a tube which was allowing the infant to breathe, Dr Lee said the panel's analysis suggests the infant collapsed because it was fitted with the wrong size tube in the first place by a consultant who "didn't know what he was doing". There are similar findings for all Letby's victims: the panel said all the deaths could be explained by natural causes or medical errors.
I find it hard to apply my normal rational judgement to this case, because it involves kids so young. My mind tells me if she only killed one kid, let alone however many, she should spend life behind bars. At the same time I do recognise that I wouldn't want the wrong person to be serving time because of over emotional and irrational judgements...it's a hard one for sure, I think the onus now is on her to prove those judgements wrong...through her legal team...and until they do she is guilty. If this does get anywhere, then they will need to keep her in solitary, because the inmates aint going to be so understanding.
The thing now is that even if the evidence prooves she did nothing wrong and was'nt even present for some of the deaths many people will still say she is guilty and she will never have a normal life again. In some ways i hope she is guilty otherwise her life will be ruined for something she did'nt do.
The problem we got with our health service is we expect too much of it, and everytime an incident occurs we want someone to blame, we didn't do this, or we didn't do that, and why did we do this and it just goes on...then compensation claims. If we really want someone to blame and put in jail it should be the politicians, but it's easier to attack a mere woman who means nowt to anyone. So yup it's ****, but a court did find her guilty and now she has to follow the process or stay forever in jail.
That's the worrying bit. Did she have a really **** lawyer who just did no work because from what i have heard on the radio the last couple of days there was more than enough evidence to throw serious doubt on the charges without the fact she was'nt even in work on the days of some of the deaths.
I sat on a murder trial once and it was a long trial, the defence lawyer was absolute dog ****, so he got found guilty.
Been listening to some of the new evidence, the reason the apnea alarm did not sound was because the apnea alarm is set to go off if there is a 20 second period of no breaths, but because the baby was GASPING, at less than 20 seconds each time the apnea alarm was not triggered, not because the alarm was turned off. The baby had a bacteria infection that the doctors (not the nurse) failed to recognise and treat her for, antibiotics. I think the problem here is that not only do the Jury not understand half the jargon used, I expect the prosecution don't either, and they accused the nurse in the death of another baby of doing something, that is not just completely and utterly wrong in medical terms, but there has never been a case of a baby dying in the way described ever, what was referred to in the prosecutions case was a completely different type of death, which would not have resulted from actions of the nurse. It's interesting, when it's described in detail by Dr Shoo Lee, a Canadian neonatologist (retired). It's a 2 hour video, listened to 45 mins so far, but I've had to go back a few times to check my understanding.
https://x.com/itvnews/status/1887567342797758491?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1887567342797758491|twgr^18d10e804fe1fd38423978cb5c9369e7c25f00ee|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https://www.waccoe.com/index.php?app=coremodule=systemcontroller=embedurl=https://x.com/itvnews/status/1887567342797758491?t=T0UqJEdLUbAB9QMTJmgfNg26s=19 Hiding in plain sight': ITV News uncovers multiple claims of sexually inappropriate behaviour by Gino D'Acampo. Dozens of people have detailed experiences described variously as "unacceptable," "distressing" and "horrendous" while working with him over more than 12 years Anyone shocked
****ing dickhead was drink driving. He’s got serious injuries but not life threatening. Bad news if you're travelling by train between Liverpool and Manchester today. A car crashed last night at Regent Roundabout in Salford, landing on the railway tracks, where it still remains. The crash caused serious damage to the tracks and overhead cables. Until it is cleared, there will be extensive disruption on train routes between Liverpool and Manchester today, Network Rail says.
