Correct...? I've got no problem with teams spending money. Couldn't care less. Newcastle should be able to go wild if they wanted. But I'm also not having any boring garbage about a team 'not spending much' when 14 of their squad cost 50m+.
I said they've spent far less than the teams mentioned OVER THE LAST 3 YEARS, which is the period of time used to calculate FFP.
Newcastle have spunked half a billion. hardly hands tied behind their back stuff. Best bit of business seems to be Isak. But was by no means an unknown risk at £60m plus.
What like Danns, Bradley, Curtis, trent City got Foden who is still trying to break Into the team 8years later and rico lewis.
We may possibly be signing the first Palestinian to ever play in the Premier League... imagine the bantz... https://www.leicestercity.news/tran...arget-who-idolises-neymar-and-erling-haaland/
But without PSR, they'd also have an unreal backline, another top notch wing forward and a top-5 in the world manager.
Squad market values and how much each one of those three has spent year on year, net. Most recent season first. City Liverpool Arsenal (1.29bn) (0.97bn) (1.15bn) -40m +5m -25m -140m -112m -165m +7m -65m -160m -45m -62m -160m -110m -67m -66m -100m +38m -105m -20m -140m -70m -230m +10m +10m -180m +10m -100m -140m -36m -20m -70m -50m -90m -100m -26m -35m -15m -60m +10m -60m -47m +13m -140m +5m -15m -117m +5m +35m -130m -25m -15m -67m -45m +26m
Yang…our next Asian money making scheme by Levy is going out on loan to QPR I hear @Horny 4 Hamas to confirm
