James Perch

Hahahahaha, forgot football was most predictable sport on the planet.

But when he is at fault people won't point at him....

 

Photomodel???????????????????????????????????

Anyone know what he's hiding behind the long sleeve tops?

 

james perch was decent so to blame him for our loss chappaz

 

Perch kept Drogba and Torres quiet for long periods, our team when we conceded the last two goals was this:

Krul
Obertan Simpson Perch Raylor
-------- Cabaye Guthrie Sammy
Ba Shola​

 

I'm simply saying Kadar is better and I base that on the fact Perch is ****. Every time I see him we concede, even if he's not playing. I don't have anything against him but Santon would be my choice. not that he's a CB either.

 

Every time you see him we concede - even when he's not playing!!.... Err wtf? Ha ha you really are a moron if you believe it's some sort of superstition and just perch's mere presence causes us to concede

 

It was more of a joke and to be honest I don't like your tone. If your going to argue Perch should be starting over Santon that's fair enough but I'm entitled to my opinion.

 

I disagree that santon is better than perch at CB simply because he's played for inter. would you play obertan in a CM position just because he's played for manure?

Who knows Santon might be a versatile player, but right now it's impossible to make such a comparison, only pardew knows if he's capable. Perch is our utility man and performed quite well today IN THE CM POSITION. with saylor out i do not see why perch should not start (providing santon isn't as versatile and kadar isn't in form).

 

Perch is not a CB either so that argument is invalid. I would also suggest he way way better in any position than Perch.

He's bigger, he's taller, hes faster, he has more technical abilty, he can tackle and he can play long balls better.

 

I've never seen santon play CB but then again neither have you so let's leave pardew to make the best informed decision eh?

Just sick of your negativity mate. Perch played well. Stop being so negative

 

If Perch is anything, he's a CB. He looks more natural there than anywhere else he's played for us.

 

Santon plays CB for Italy U-21s. However I don't want him to play there as I want him to nail down 1 slot. Shift Raylor to CB and Santon at LB Raylor wont be as exposed and his pace wont matter as much.

 

Can't blame Perch for the goals. He actually looked quite decent.

Just a bad day at the office, we'll get over it.

 

Does he? I've only seen him once for them admittedly, but it was at RB.

IMO, the argument is invalid as Raylor was slaughtered yet again and Santon should be LB IMO.

 

Are you serious? hes ****, have you all been on the sauce? Santon should play there we are in ****in emergency without Colo and Taylor and he is in a different league to Perch. simple as that. I don't mean to be nasty about Perch but this is as simple as deciding whether to go with Marks & Spencer or Aldi.

 

He's played CB the twice I watched him

However, I agree Santon for LB. Also if it's true Saylor's out for a while then Raylor at CB until Willo is back up to fitness.

 

If both Colo and Saylor are out for Norwich I'd consider Simpson at CB, he doesnt look too bad there. Got to be Kadar though, surely?

 

Santon is like 6 ft plus so CB for me, Raylor will do fine at left back against the next 3 teams. Once Colo and Taylor are back move Santon to left back though I agree.

 

I actually agree, long term there are a lot of things to be sorted but short term we just have to survive until Colo's back - he can play with anyone.

 

It's not negative to suggest we have a better option on the bench.