The Romans built things for the things they had at that time, people, horses and simple carriages. 2000 years later they are still capable of supporting those things. The things we have built for the things we have are ****ed after 50 years if not less.
How many years do you think a Roman road would last if it was carrying 90,000 vehicles a day, weighing up to 40 tonnes?
I suppose if the Romans had 90,000 vehicles weighing 40 tons they would have built a suitable road. Try reading my post again.
True Depends on the distance and fortification Excluding mounted guns Do the romans win until the invention if the m16?
Interesting question. What happens in another 50, 100, 200 years when presumably most buildings would no longer be sound? Presumably modern buildings (say last century and this) won't stand for ever. Will houses need rebuilding? Will whole towns & cities need somehow rebuilding?
Maybe they will include the cinema still bomb damaged from 80 years ago in their rebuilding? Doesn't fill you with confidence about how quickly the rebuilding will get done in Hull.
Other structures have managed well.All our office blocks, high rises etc made of concrete won’t be here in 2,000 years like some Roman structures. The Pantheon still has the largest unreinforced concrete dome in the world 1500 years after it was built.
Do you know what mate I can't remember, they had dogs there of course. I'll have to try and look that up. Edit: Yes they did from 1995 to 2005 which I never went to, how the **** could I not remember 10 years at Craven Park?
Its genius how they built that dome Always baffled me how modern rich people spend it in ****e instead of constructing a marvellous wonder that will be there forever
