The people who'd complain about that, would be the the same people, who'd complain if Ken was anatomically correct.
Elderly gammoney ****s like Dull or Neill don't give a **** about the future. Brainwashed by fake science funded by the US fuel giants/russia, they constantly battle to ensure a handful of rich people can continue to destroy our planet. What lives.
You have shown time, and time again, you know **** all about much. If you did understand it, you'd know why what millivolt is doing is not just damaging the environment and counter productive to reducing climate change, it's impacting food and fuel security and damaging the economy. That's before the impacts on the vulnerable. You are looking in totally the wrong place if you are seeking virtue.
Here ya go Toby. As you are now an expert, offer your expert debunking of this lady. She misses a few bits, like the impact on the rain forests for balsa etc.
Only your claim there is total nonsense. You've once again spouted off from a position of total ignorance. If we must waste resources on turbines and solar panels, why not put them on buildings, car parks, near roads etc, instead of destroying valuable agricultural land which tends to need a new network as it's at the wrong end of the grid? On that one issue alone, which would be better for the environment?