You can stop it by making it unattractive to make that journey. If this is the offering then they won't come: A bed in a dormitory in a camp which they are not allowed to exit What ever food is cheap and available including pork No spending money No prospect of ever gaining leave to remain Deportation to their country of origin if possible, France if possible, failing that anywhere that will take them
Consequences of deporting: If Britain won't stick to international agreements then maybe France will send theirs ALL over here
If you vote for me, my solution is to send them all to Jersey Jersey look down on us, it's full of *****s and tax avoiding toffs and very close to France.
We have other islands, South Georgia for example. We could send the men and boys aged over 9 there and find another island for the women.
No alternative other than actually processing the asylum claims by adequately staffing the function in the first place? ... in doing so also creating jobs for British people ... sounds good to me ... Certainly much more economically viable than the barmy Rwanda plan from the most disastrous government in modern British history... Landslide!!!
Yours isn't a bad idea. I'd go for Alderney, it's only 10 miles from France and we'd only have to relocate around 2000 inhabitants. Give the island to the gimmigrants and drop them off some food and inflatable dinghies every day.
Oh aye, the EU are experts on controlling migration aren't they. Mind, that dopey bint needs all the help she can get. She is totally out of her depth, which seems to be the default position and a required qualification for a seat in the current cabinet. please log in to view this image
If only it were simple, each and every case seems to result in a massive earner for lawyers with their snouts in the trough and repeated appeals.
Starmer has already promised to give amnesty to all illegals here already to remove the asylum application backlog. That's a deterrent to all the other chancers
