And the league cup dies and goes away.
If that's the problem then yeah, problem solved.
Yeah the competition would be meaningless. Sponsors too would be pulling out or paying peanuts
And the league cup dies and goes away.
If that's the problem then yeah, problem solved.
Yeah the competition would be meaningless. Sponsors too would be pulling out or paying peanuts

Can't agree that we need the European teams in it to fill Wembley.
Isn’t that just adding one more league to the competition that was the Sherpa Van Trophy years ago (championship)We wouldn't reach it every year though. The whole point is it'd be an open tournament and you'd get a larger spread of winners.
Also with my suggestion of giving the conference League spot to the winner then they wouldn't even be able to play in the competition the following year so by design you'd get a different winner every season.
The viewing figures are a good point though personally I've not watched any cup final for years but would if it was two smaller clubs as I'd find it more interesting. I don't think that's an uncommon view among fans of smaller clubs.
The other option is to remove all PL clubs, seeing as it's an EFL competition so would make sense if it was for their members. Though I wouldn't want that from a selfish point of view.
well given the choice of CL or LC i have an inkling most managers would prioritise the CL and considering half at least of our U21 squad has been sold / on loan christ knows who would be left for the LC squad .Isn’t that just adding one more league to the competition that was the Sherpa Van Trophy years ago (championship)
Which doesn’t sell out most years - which sort of proves Chief’s point
ftr I don’t think they should be giving the big 6 preference
Keep the draw as normal and tell them they have to put a squad in
Up to them how serious they take it
Isn’t that just adding one more league to the competition that was the Sherpa Van Trophy years ago (championship)
Which doesn’t sell out most years - which sort of proves Chief’s point
ftr I don’t think they should be giving the big 6 preference
Keep the draw as normal and tell them they have to put a squad in
Up to them how serious they take it
They usually win it anyway, if you go back last 20 years only Swansea and Birmingham outside of 'the cartel' have won it, so those clubs are definitely still interested. Go back thirty if you like, and you're only adding Leicester (twice - and with a losing final in between) and Boro to that.

I don't disagree with you that the overall quality of the competition would be lessened by not including anyone in Europe that year.OK, so I'll word it differently again.
With out top six teams, the competition is hugely downgraded in quality, interest tails off and, yes, the final itself becomes a damp squib because there is less interest in the competition and way fewer viewers.
And then the crowds go down.
I don't disagree with you that the overall quality of the competition would be lessened by not including anyone in Europe that year.
I don't think that the European sides should excluded, but they should be made to fit into the competition as it is. They're getting the benefits of extra European gates and TV revenues. They should have to field whatever side they feel fit to compete in all the competitions they've qualified for.
If there were exclusions, to suggest the final would be a damp squib just because sides competing in Europe aren't in it is fairly ignorant and wouldn't reflect the views of any fans of any clubs making it that far.
Crowds going down? Not sure I get the correlation there - the majority of clubs and their supporters could't give flying **** about the European sides in any given year (can't be top 6, as it doesn't work like that). Fans support their team in droves, whoever they're playing.
TV viewers, yes the point stands that it's likely figures would be less throughout the competition due to European sides followings... Again all boils down to money vs sporting integrity of the competition structure. The seeding / splitting of European cubs and the pre-weighted favour of a home tie is a joke.
Come on be realistic, having a trophy without any sides that qualified for Europe the previous season would massively affect the prestige of the competition (as it is, most sides play weakened teams anyway)
I don’t like the new format of keeping teams apart because they’re in Europe but the only other viable solution is to scrap it completely and I don’t think most clubs want that.
FTFY![]()
I don't disagree with you that the overall quality of the competition would be lessened by not including anyone in Europe that year.
I don't think that the European sides should excluded, but they should be made to fit into the competition as it is. They're getting the benefits of extra European gates and TV revenues. They should have to field whatever side they feel fit to compete in all the competitions they've qualified for.
If there were exclusions, to suggest the final would be a damp squib just because sides competing in Europe aren't in it is fairly ignorant and wouldn't reflect the views of any fans of any clubs making it that far.
Crowds going down? Not sure I get the correlation there - the majority of clubs and their supporters could't give flying **** about the European sides in any given year (can't be top 6, as it doesn't work like that). Fans support their team in droves, whoever they're playing.
TV viewers, yes the point stands that it's likely figures would be less throughout the competition due to European sides followings... Again all boils down to money vs sporting integrity of the competition structure. The seeding / splitting of European cubs and the pre-weighted favour of a home tie is a joke.
You say that as fan of a bigger club though.
**** the prestige the more chance of us winning something the better.
I'd have rather beaten Hull in the final in 2017 than most to United.
So SKY Sports claim there is no extra charge for EFL matches, hmmm, but what they don't advertise is they've put an end to offers for those that subscribe through NOW TV. I've been paying £17.99 a month for 6 months, and only about just over £20 for the previous six months. Anyway, my offer finally ends at the end of September when they want me to take a £34.99 per month subscription lol....and they are not offering reductions for long term customer cancellations.
Although the terms have always been 6 months, it's always been cancel at anytime. However, they have got an alternative, 12 months FIXED at £26 per month. So hang on let's work this out, the two options are £26 at a fixed 12 months even though the football season is only 9 months long, well 8 by the end of next month or £34.99 a month cancel when you want...go on, I'll let you do the sums...
You must log in or register to see images
Spurs might be a ‘big’ club but they don’t win trophies so I can relate to wanting to win anything. A league cup without the best sides though would end up akin to winning the championship and wouldn’t even be classed as a major trophy.
Spurs might be a ‘big’ club but they don’t win trophies so I can relate to wanting to win anything. A league cup without the best sides though would end up akin to winning the championship and wouldn’t even be classed as a major trophy.
Every league title is a trophy to be proud of if your a small to medium sized club and you work your way through the leagues winning titles on the way then you are the best in that league at that time
