I got pelters when I spoke up about this. I was told in no uncertain terms that all these premature threads were the way it always used to be and actually splitting them out once confirmed was only the new way. I was accused of having “a narrative” (or maybe it was an agenda) simply because I didn’t really like it and made two (count them, two) posts about it. This would be the third. So i guess means I firmly have one now. Or whatever the next step up isWe really have got to stop SaintMagic and Tom going early on these 'Saint...!' threads. We are on a terrible run, that's now Bijlow, O'Riley and Carvalho![]()
Although the run isn’t that terrible because haven’t there been at least two or three confirmed ones in between? Meaning the last bunch have been about 50% hit rate?
Some of them do seem like they warrant split discussion but some people are used the the “Saint” part meaning they are done deal because of a couple of years of that being the case (even if it is not a long time in the grand scheme of things)